2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of intelligent computational tools for damage detection and identification with an emphasis on composites – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of the SHM is characterized by being a very promising alternative and efficient with respect to the conventional methods. Indeed, visual inspections are not always possible and are, in any case, expensive in terms of time and money, while the use of conventional methods cannot give up on the operator experience [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the SHM is characterized by being a very promising alternative and efficient with respect to the conventional methods. Indeed, visual inspections are not always possible and are, in any case, expensive in terms of time and money, while the use of conventional methods cannot give up on the operator experience [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a vital material widely used in structure buildings, metal plates are isotropic and have a working condition of high temperature, high pressure and strong noise. To minimize the maintenance costs and to increase the lifetime of these structures, researchers are increasingly interested in improving current nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technologies or building advanced structural health monitoring (SHM) strategies [1,5]. Specifically, SHM schemes are generally applied to the localization and identification of metal plates deficiencies which are commonly fatigue cracks according to AE technology [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various damage modes exist (e.g., delamination, fiber fracture, and matrix cracking) and their detection and characterization are rather difficult. Delamination is the most common and dangerous failure mode for composites, because it takes place and grows in the absence of any visible surface damage, making it difficult to detect by visual inspection [2,3,4]. Due to the general anisotropic behavior [5] and complex damage scenarios, the successful implementation of delamination detection in aerospace composite structures is always challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%