The use of in vitro chemotherapy in grapevine virus elimination

Guță, I. C.; Buciumeanu, E. C.; Topala, Carmen Mihaela; Tătaru, L.D.

doi:10.17660/actahortic.2017.1155.63

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Neuraminidase can be found in plants, animals, and microorganisms and on the surface of some members of Orthomyxoviridae [ 188 ] and Paramyxoviridae [ 189 ], but not in plant viruses. Thus, it is not expected to be effective against them, as was observed when it was applied alone [ 190 ]. However, using it in combined treatment with RBV was proven to be effective against potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) [ 156 ] and grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) viruses [ 191 ].…”

Section: Virus Elimination By Chemotherapymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The multiplication rate of the other variety (‘Frâncuşă 15Od’) was not also influenced significantly during the first sub-culture, while it was significantly reduced by each treatment in the third sub-culture. In the second sub-culture, the shoot proliferation was significantly inhibited by two combinations (40 mg/L RBV with 40 mg/L OSTV and 20 mg RBV with 40 mg/L OSTV) [ 190 ].…”

Section: Virus Elimination By Chemotherapymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Phytotoxicity and Other Adverse Effects on the In Vitro Shoot Cultures Caused by Virus Elimination Treatments: Reasons and Solutions

Magyar-Tábori

Mendler-Drienyovszki

Hanász

et al. 2021

Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In general, in vitro virus elimination is based on the culture of isolated meristem, and in addition thermotherapy, chemotherapy, electrotherapy, and cryotherapy can also be applied. During these processes, plantlets suffer several stresses, which can result in low rate of survival, inhibited growth, incomplete development, or abnormal morphology. Even though the in vitro cultures survive the treatment, further development can be inhibited; thus, regeneration capacity of treated in vitro shoots or explants play also an important role in successful virus elimination. Sensitivity of genotypes to treatments is very different, and the rate of destruction largely depends on the physiological condition of plants as well. Exposure time of treatments affects the rate of damage in almost every therapy. Other factors such as temperature, illumination (thermotherapy), type and concentration of applied chemicals (chemo- and cryotherapy), and electric current intensity (electrotherapy) also may have a great impact on the rate of damage. However, there are several ways to decrease the harmful effect of treatments. This review summarizes the harmful effects of virus elimination treatments applied on tissue cultures reported in the literature. The aim of this review is to expound the solutions that can be used to mitigate phytotoxic and other adverse effects in practice.

show abstract

Section: Virus Elimination By Chemotherapymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Virus Elimination By Chemotherapymentioning

confidence: 99%

Phytotoxicity and Other Adverse Effects on the In Vitro Shoot Cultures Caused by Virus Elimination Treatments: Reasons and Solutions

Magyar-Tábori

Mendler-Drienyovszki

Hanász

et al. 2021

Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Eukaryotic splicing machinery in the plant–virus battleground

Das

Aslam

et al. 2023

WIREs RNA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant virual infections are mainly caused by plant‐virus parasitism which affects ecological communities. Some viruses are highly pathogen specific that can infect only specific plants, while some can cause widespread harm, such as tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). After a virus infects the host, undergoes a series of harmful effects, including the destruction of host cell membrane receptors, changes in cell membrane components, cell fusion, and the production of neoantigens on the cell surface. Therefore, competition between the host and the virus arises. The virus starts gaining control of critical cellular functions of the host cells and ultimately affects the fate of the targeted host plants. Among these critical cellular processes, alternative splicing (AS) is an essential posttranscriptional regulation process in RNA maturation, which amplify host protein diversity and manipulates transcript abundance in response to plant pathogens. AS is widespread in nearly all human genes and critical in regulating animal‐virus interactions. In particular, an animal virus can hijack the host splicing machinery to re‐organize its compartments for propagation. Changes in AS are known to cause human disease, and various AS events have been reported to regulate tissue specificity, development, tumour proliferation, and multi‐functionality. However, the mechanisms underlying plant–virus interactions are poorly understood. Here, we summarize the current understanding of how viruses interact with their plant hosts compared with humans, analyze currently used and putative candidate agrochemicals to treat plant‐viral infections, and finally discussed the potential research hotspots in the future.This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > Splicing Mechanisms RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing

show abstract

The use of in vitro chemotherapy in grapevine virus elimination

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

Phytotoxicity and Other Adverse Effects on the In Vitro Shoot Cultures Caused by Virus Elimination Treatments: Reasons and Solutions

Phytotoxicity and Other Adverse Effects on the In Vitro Shoot Cultures Caused by Virus Elimination Treatments: Reasons and Solutions

Eukaryotic splicing machinery in the plant–virus battleground

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About