1961
DOI: 10.1378/chest.40.6.639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Hypertonic Aerosol in Production of Sputum for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique of sputum induction with hypertonic saline was introduced 140 years ago [1]. Early studies demonstrated evidence of enhanced performance relative to the GW procedure; however, recent outbreaks of multidrug-resistant TB associated with its use in infectious diseases units have discouraged some clinicians from using this method [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique of sputum induction with hypertonic saline was introduced 140 years ago [1]. Early studies demonstrated evidence of enhanced performance relative to the GW procedure; however, recent outbreaks of multidrug-resistant TB associated with its use in infectious diseases units have discouraged some clinicians from using this method [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods vary in their tolerability, in their safety, and, notably, in their resource implications; bronchoscopy may not be feasible if large numbers of patients are involved, and it may not even be necessary if smearpositive specimens have been obtained by other, less invasive methods. Evidence of the relative diagnostic yield of each technique varies, although recent studies suggest that IS performs as well as BAL [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. There are limited data on the number of IS samples required, the optimum volume of the sample for mycobacterial culture, and (most importantly) the timing of speci- Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI was performed using saline concentrations ranging from 3 to 20% (median 3%, IQR 3-10), using a variety of ultrasonic nebulizers or conventional air compressors, and varying duration of saline nebulization (data incomplete). Eight studies (47%) compared SI to gastric lavage [13,[22][23][24][25][26], six studies (35%) to FOB [12,14,[27][28][29], three studies (18%) to spontaneous expectorated sputum [29][30][31], three studies (18%) compared SI to other invasive procedures, including the string test, lymph node biopsy, and nasopharyngeal aspiration [32][33][34], and two studies (12%) compared three diagnostic procedures (SI, spontaneous sputum, and FOB in one publication [31], and SI, gastric lavage, and FOB in the other [9]). …”
Section: Studies Recommended By Tuberculosis Experts N=12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that patients with radiographic evidence and with smear negativity due to inability to expectorate adequate amount of sputum are left untreated which ultimately increases the burden of tuberculosis. Obtaining gastric washings, sputum induction done with hypertonic saline and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage are established techniques for this indication, though these methods vary in their tolerability, safety and resource implications 3,4 . Sputum Induction is a safe and effective means of obtaining specimens for AFB smear and culture in persons suspected of having PTB but who cannot produce sputum spontaneously or who are smear-negative for AFB 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%