1971
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0500553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of High Magnesium Limestone in the Diet of the Laying Hen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this were true, the results previously reported by Stillmak and Sunde (1971) would permit normal egg production and shell quality when dolomite is fed in a finely ground form incorporated into the ration. First of all, the level of dolomite necessary to supply the levels of calcium needed by the laying hen would result in large amounts of magnesium being introduced into the diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If this were true, the results previously reported by Stillmak and Sunde (1971) would permit normal egg production and shell quality when dolomite is fed in a finely ground form incorporated into the ration. First of all, the level of dolomite necessary to supply the levels of calcium needed by the laying hen would result in large amounts of magnesium being introduced into the diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Deobald et al (1936) using dolomite added to the chicks diet at rates equivalent to 2% calcium carbonate obtained results similar to those of Bethke et al (1929). General management and procedure followed in experiments 1 through 4 were those discussed by Stillmak and Sunde (1971). This paper will report further results obtained from the first four experiments dealing with dolomitic limestone (Stillmak and Sunde, 1971) plus additional data concerning the availability of calcium from dolomite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may have contributed to the watery excreta. Magnesium has also been reported to cause a watery appearance of the feces with no increase in fecal moisture (Stillmak and Sunde, 1971).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%