1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00127-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of high density metal foils to increase surface dose in low-energy clinical electron beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, appropriate foil combinations for 90% surface dose were taken as three 0.005 inch (total 0.381 mm) foils for 9 and 12 MeV, and two 0.005 inch foils with one 0.05 mm foil (total 0.304 mm) for 6 MeV. These results are similar to those of Lambert et al 7 for a 10 x 10 cm 2 field and 100 cm SSD of surface dose 88.5% for 0.3 mm tin foil Measurements of central axis depth dose under the tin foils allowed the measurement of the therapeutic range R 90 and therapeutic interval, as well as relative surface dose. Such measurements were performed for 4 x 4, 6 x 6, and 10 x 10 cm 2 field sizes at 100 cm SSD ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on these results, appropriate foil combinations for 90% surface dose were taken as three 0.005 inch (total 0.381 mm) foils for 9 and 12 MeV, and two 0.005 inch foils with one 0.05 mm foil (total 0.304 mm) for 6 MeV. These results are similar to those of Lambert et al 7 for a 10 x 10 cm 2 field and 100 cm SSD of surface dose 88.5% for 0.3 mm tin foil Measurements of central axis depth dose under the tin foils allowed the measurement of the therapeutic range R 90 and therapeutic interval, as well as relative surface dose. Such measurements were performed for 4 x 4, 6 x 6, and 10 x 10 cm 2 field sizes at 100 cm SSD ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Lambert et al 7 have suggested that these results are consistent with tin having a higher scatter power than water and a higher ratio of scattering power to stopping power than water. Exceptions to these findings were found for 12 MeV, and for the 9 MeV, 4 x 4 cm 2 field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations