1997
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of goal programming and data envelopment analysis for estimating efficient marginal costs of outputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This operation is maximized or minimized by a group of constraints incompatible between equations [5]. The algorithm must be able to choose the constrain to be violated in order to reach a feasible solution.…”
Section: Goal Programingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This operation is maximized or minimized by a group of constraints incompatible between equations [5]. The algorithm must be able to choose the constrain to be violated in order to reach a feasible solution.…”
Section: Goal Programingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sherman (1981Sherman ( , 1982 illustrated that econometric regression techniques are less powerful than DEA in identifying efficient production relationships. The data generated by Sherman were later used for regression analysis (RA) and DEA by Bowlin, Chames, Cooper and Sherman (1985) and Giokas (1997). Specifically, Bowlin et al (1985) extended the study of Sherman (1984) by comparing DEA, RA and ratio analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted that the three techniques are not mutually exclusive; it is not necessary to select solely one option for a given case, and a combination of the two approaches can be used. Giokas (1997) utilized DEA to generate efficient costs and then carried out RA to determine new weights (marginal costs) for the independent (output) variables. Giokas showed that the marginal costs of the outputs derived from the combination of DEA at the first stage and either goal-programming or regression at the second appeared to be more accurate than those based on DEA or RA alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations