2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of Goal Attainment Scaling in a community health promotion initiative with seniors

Abstract: Background: Evaluating collaborative community health promotion initiatives presents unique challenges, including engaging community members and other stakeholders in the evaluation process, and measuring the attainment of goals at the collective community level. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a versatile, under-utilized evaluation tool adaptable to a wide range of situations. GAS actively involves all partners in the evaluation process and has many benefits when used in community health settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One interviewer provided the goal-setting interventions but this could be conducted in different contexts outside of the Centre and presented through different media. There is some evidence that goal-setting approaches can be used in groups as part of community-wide health promotion and community development (Kloseck, 2007; Kolip & Schaefer, 2013) and group administration of the AgeWell protocol could be considered. The application of goal-setting interventions could also be been adopted in web-based formats (O’Donnell, Greene, & Blissmer, 2014), although further evidence is required to assess the effectiveness of this type of online administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One interviewer provided the goal-setting interventions but this could be conducted in different contexts outside of the Centre and presented through different media. There is some evidence that goal-setting approaches can be used in groups as part of community-wide health promotion and community development (Kloseck, 2007; Kolip & Schaefer, 2013) and group administration of the AgeWell protocol could be considered. The application of goal-setting interventions could also be been adopted in web-based formats (O’Donnell, Greene, & Blissmer, 2014), although further evidence is required to assess the effectiveness of this type of online administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, GAS has been used to measure spasticity management, where patients tend to have severe and complex disabilities that often affect multiple aspects of their physical functioning [24]. GAS has also been successfully applied at the community level to evaluate health promotion initiatives with seniors where each initiative had different community specific processes and potential outcomes [27]. GAS has also been suggested for use in: mental health, rehabilitation, stroke rehabilitation, pharmacy, and other health care settings [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Implications For Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of achievement of the local QI projects will be assessed using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) [56] at 12 and 24 months after the intervention. GAS is an appropriate method to assess programs that have an individualized approach to intervention planning and was shown to be a reliable, valid and responsive method to document the impact of QI programs [57,58]. GAS scales will be developed in collaboration with each local implementation committee.…”
Section: Intervention Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%