2011
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.571299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of global synthetic data for pre-launch tuning of the VIIRS cloud mask algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are shown in Table . Performance results (i.e., PCT, false alarm, and leakage) are computed for the binary cloud mask, which is defined as pixels classified as confidently clear and cloudy pixels [ Hutchison et al ., ]. Only clouds with optical depths greater than or equal to 1.0 are considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are shown in Table . Performance results (i.e., PCT, false alarm, and leakage) are computed for the binary cloud mask, which is defined as pixels classified as confidently clear and cloudy pixels [ Hutchison et al ., ]. Only clouds with optical depths greater than or equal to 1.0 are considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical definitions of these performance metrics are shown in Hutchison et al . []. PCT quantifies the raw number/percentage of clear/cloudy pixels as correct.…”
Section: The Vcm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1.38 μm channel of SGLI should be very effective for detection of thin cirrus. However, as discussed by Ackerman et al [], Miller and Lee [], and Hutchison et al [], the 1.38 μm signal can be highly variable for the dry atmospheric conditions commonly encountered over Greenland and Antarctica and needs to be carefully tuned to minimize the out‐of‐band responses of SGLI's 1.38 μm channel. Since snow and clouds are basically indistinguishable in visible and near IR channels (as shown in Figure 5 of Imaoka et al []), we will focus on using the two SWIR channels of SGLI, SW3 centered at 1.63 μm and SW4 at 2.20 μm, for cloud detection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of the HCHM algorithm builds upon the work and valuable experience of MOD‐CLD‐MASK [ Ackerman et al , ], MOD‐CLD‐DT [ Levy et al , ], MOD‐CLD‐DB [ Hsu et al , ], VII‐CLD‐MASK [ Hutchison et al , ; Baker , ], CLD‐Claudia [ Ishida and Nakajima , ; Nakajima et al , ], and a regime‐dependent cloud mask algorithm [ Zou and Da , ]. Based on the available AHI band sets, the tests are divided into two groups to identify cloud and clear and haze pixels.…”
Section: Hchm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%