2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of geometric morphometric analysis to illustrate the shape change induced by different fruit hosts on the wing shape of Bactrocera dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is expected that when rearing conditions change (e.g. host plant), organisms and populations adapt to the new conditions (Clarke 1998;Benítez et al 2014a;Pieterse et al 2017). Similar results have been reported using GM methods for other invasive species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is expected that when rearing conditions change (e.g. host plant), organisms and populations adapt to the new conditions (Clarke 1998;Benítez et al 2014a;Pieterse et al 2017). Similar results have been reported using GM methods for other invasive species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The previous geometric morphometric studies showed that wing shapes differ between taxonomic groups and can be used for insect identification (Henry et al, 2010;Schutze et al, 2012). In accordance with geometric morphometric, our finding is in line with the observations of Khamis et al (2012) and Pieterse et al (2017) who found that points in junction of vein R4+5 and r-m crossvein and also junction of vein M and dm-cu influenced the landmark shifts in classifying Bactrocera and Ceratitis species. This present study provided conclusive evidence that clarified the differences of geometrical shapes in discriminating taxa for a quick diagnostic character of wing shape.…”
Section: The Angle Measurements and Comparison Of Veinsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The quality and amount of larval food β source affect larval growth rate, which in turn determines larval and adult size (Davidowitz & Nijhout, 2004). The different host plants influenced wing size of B. dorsalis, Ceratitis capitata (Pieterse et al, 2017), Drosophila gouveai and D. antonietae (Soto et al, 2010). The nutritional approach studied by Sentinella et al (2013) revealed that the increasing body size of Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae) was affected by carbohydrate in larval diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential pitfalls of using P ST as an approximation of Q ST (Pujol et al, 2008), the differences in P ST estimates among different quantitative traits also support the hypothesis that wing traits might be a response to environmental challenges yielding different outcomes in different fruits. The effects of the host on wing morphology have been recorded in cactophylic species of Drosophila (Robertson, 1987;Soto et al, 2010) as well as in several tephritid species (Navarro-Campos et al, 2011;Gómez Cendra et al, 2016;Pieterse et al, 2017). There is evidence in many insects than smaller sizes are associated with lowerquality diets (Danthanarayana, 1976;Chapman, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%