2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of fluctuating asymmetry as a measure of farming practice effects in rodents: A species-specific response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, attempts to use phenotypic abnormalities (especially asymmetry) as a fitness proxy to measure population health have met with mixed success 16 , 19 , 23 – 26 . Variation in phenotypic traits is a complex result of genetic and epigenetic factors, maternal effects and developmental environments, as well as interactions between these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, attempts to use phenotypic abnormalities (especially asymmetry) as a fitness proxy to measure population health have met with mixed success 16 , 19 , 23 – 26 . Variation in phenotypic traits is a complex result of genetic and epigenetic factors, maternal effects and developmental environments, as well as interactions between these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-rodent species utilize microhabitats for survival and reproduction based on requirements such as food, water, den, shelter, and space; these habitat requirements are species-specific (Mallegowda et al, 2015;Coda et al, 2016). Microhabitat occupancies may therefore differ among sympatric species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological assessment of the state of living organisms which is based on fluctuating asymmetry is one of the commonly used methods for ecological monitoring by both national and foreign scientists (Zakharov, 1987;Gileva & Kosareva, 1994;Zakharov et al, 2000;Gileva & Nokhrin, 2001;Vasil'ev, 2005;Gileva et al, 2007;Vasil'eva et al, 2003;Yalkovskaya et al, 2016;Pankakoski et al, 1992;Markowski, 1993;Graham et al, 2000;Oleksyk et al, 2004;Veličković, 2004;Vishalakshi & Singh, 2008;Allenbach, 2011;Coda et al, 2016Coda et al, , 2017Benítez et al, 2018). The assessment of the state of animal populations is essential in itself as a parameter of biodiversity (Ryadinskaya & Kokhonov, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%