1951
DOI: 10.1037/h0056677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of extended control-group designs in human relations studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A. 4 Relationships between stimulus ambiguity and social influence will be reported in a later paper. In general, our results clearly substantiate the findings of Asch (1), Coffin (5), and Moos and Koslin ( 14), influence being positively related to the degree of ambiguity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A. 4 Relationships between stimulus ambiguity and social influence will be reported in a later paper. In general, our results clearly substantiate the findings of Asch (1), Coffin (5), and Moos and Koslin ( 14), influence being positively related to the degree of ambiguity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The over-all picture of the effects of selfcommittal are best seen by ignoring differences in stimulus ambiguity (i.e., the actual number of dots on the five different slides), 4 and examining the behavior of our groups on all the blocks. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%