2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Dynamic Assist Orthosis for Muscle Reeducation following Brachial Plexus Injury and Reconstruction

Abstract: Therapeutic management of brachial plexus injuries remains complex. The impact of brachial plexus injuries on everyday human functioning should not be underestimated. Early active-assisted range of motion following such injuries may prevent myostatic contractures, minimize muscle atrophy, facilitate muscle fiber recruitment, and enable a faster return to baseline strength levels. The dynamic assist elbow flexion orthosis proposed is designed to provide patients with a graded system for muscle reeducation and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior reports in the literature document various forms of elbow flexion orthoses that have been indicated to assist with rehabilitation after insufficient recovery from a BPI. [3][4][5] These studies typically focused on the rehabilitative potential of the device and were oftentimes case studies in laboratory settings instead of determining the impact of the device on a patient's daily life. Although recent case studies indicate the potential for improvement in clinical outcomes using an MEO after BPI, the patients' perspectives on such use are still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior reports in the literature document various forms of elbow flexion orthoses that have been indicated to assist with rehabilitation after insufficient recovery from a BPI. [3][4][5] These studies typically focused on the rehabilitative potential of the device and were oftentimes case studies in laboratory settings instead of determining the impact of the device on a patient's daily life. Although recent case studies indicate the potential for improvement in clinical outcomes using an MEO after BPI, the patients' perspectives on such use are still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual reality and robotics combined to facilitate upper extremity pain management and sensory recovery after brachial plexus injury ( 44 ). The very first mention of dynamic orthoses as having a role in motor re-education came in 2018 ( 37 ), but more recent research has revealed that dynamic nocturnal orthoses are equally effective as continuous cast immobilization in treating elbow flexion contractures in kids with brachial plexus nerve birth injuries ( 45 ). As children’s upper extremities move less than those of adults, dynamic orthoses may only serve as a fixation device in children with brachial plexus injuries while offering more motor support in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment methods may rely on the expertise of experienced physicians and therapists. Power-assisted orthoses can offer a functional replacement in the end phase and have some effectiveness in motor re-education when the surgical benefit is not preferably factored in ( 37 ). Rehabilitation of brachial plexus injuries in the sequela period seems to be a neglected area that needs further development.…”
Section: Adult Brachial Plexus Injury Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As muscle function and motor control improve, the assistance of dynamic orthosis and support systems, such as suspension slings, are gradually decreased, and patients will progressively perform exercises against gravity. Furthermore, as quality of motion improves, the concept of donor activation is slowly reduced, and the concept of selective activation, or “donor deactivation,” is initiated to free the patient from the requirement for donor nerve/muscle function to produce useful motion 13,14,27. That is, by the end of their rehabilitation process, patients should have achieved sufficient cortical reorganization to be able to perform receptor muscle action “unconsciously” and without the need to “first think” of the donor nerve/muscle function (donor activation).…”
Section: Rehabilitation Following Nerve Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as quality of motion improves, the concept of donor activation is slowly reduced, and the concept of selective activation, or "donor deactivation," is initiated to free the patient from the requirement for donor nerve/muscle function to produce useful motion. 13,14,27 That is, by the end of their rehabilitation process, patients should have achieved sufficient cortical reorganization to be able to perform receptor muscle action "unconsciously" and without the need to "first think" of the donor nerve/muscle function (donor activation). The importance of donor deactivation, and cortical plasticity in our opinion is important to long term success and improved outcomes.…”
Section: Phase 4: Strengthening Phasementioning
confidence: 99%