2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-009-0205-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of driver inserts to reduce non-ideal pressure variations behind reflected shock waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At lower temperatures where longer test times are required, near-constant pressure profiles over the longer test times were achieved by using driver inserts. Further details on driver insert design can be found in Hong et al [16].…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower temperatures where longer test times are required, near-constant pressure profiles over the longer test times were achieved by using driver inserts. Further details on driver insert design can be found in Hong et al [16].…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we measured propane ignition delay times in a lean mixture (0.8% C 3 H 8 /8% O 2 /Ar) at nominal pressures of 6, 24 and 60 atm, first using a conventional shock tube, to confirm the discrepancies between experimental data and simulations based on two current chemical mechanisms using constant U and V constraints. We then employed a driver-insert method (developed in our laboratory [8]) to minimize the post-shock pressure variations and generate near-constant-volume test conditions for the propane oxidation study. (Preliminary 6-atm propane ignition time measurements without the driver insert were previously described in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfactory results could be obtained using analytical and numerical §uid dynamic approaches to layout such a facility [7,18]. Two sample results from two di¨erent facilities (DDST at ITLR ¡ Universit at Stuttgart and HPST at the High Temperature Gasdynamics Laboratory ¡ Stanford University) were shown above in Fig.…”
Section: Shock Tube Characterization and Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The e¨ects of the skimmer on the Figure 5 Detailed view of the driver section showing the contoured liner insert Figure 6 Experimental pressure traces with (1) and without (2) driver insert from two di¨erent facilities. The dashed lines indicate very uniform test conditions when using a driver insert and a linear pressure increase without a driver insert: (a) DDST at the Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics ¡ ITLR (Universit at Stuttgart) [7]; and (b) HPST at the High Temperature Gasdynamics Laboratory (Stanford University) [18] §ow conditions in the test section have been analyzed in detail in [7]. Brie §y, it turned out that as the re §ected shock wave leaves the skimmer and propagates into the circular tube (i. e., sudden widening of cross section), an expansion fan forms and travels back into the test section.…”
Section: Shock Tubementioning
confidence: 99%