2006
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2006.724.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Different Plastic Mulches on Processing Tomatoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest differences were in degradation of the different materials, being the highest in plastics from vegetable compounds (corn and potato starch, etc.). Photo-degradable plastics have the disadvantage that shaded areas do not degrade because they are not exposed to light (Armendariz et al 2006).…”
Section: Field Performance Of Biodegradable Mulch In Crop Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest differences were in degradation of the different materials, being the highest in plastics from vegetable compounds (corn and potato starch, etc.). Photo-degradable plastics have the disadvantage that shaded areas do not degrade because they are not exposed to light (Armendariz et al 2006).…”
Section: Field Performance Of Biodegradable Mulch In Crop Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choices are: (i) bio-based biodegradable polymers, or mixtures thereof with biodegradable synthetic materials; and (ii) polyethylene-based oxo-degradable polymers to which additives are incorporated to accelerate degradation. Some of these materials have been studied from the perspective of the agronomic requirements (Martín-Closas et al 2003;Arméndariz et al 2006;Moreno and Moreno 2008;Cirujeda et al 2012;Li et al 2014a). However, studies concerning their degradation in the field, as affected by a range of agro-climatic conditions, are scarce; most studies compare polyethylene to one or a few materials in only one location (Scarascia-Mugnozza et al 2006;Martin-Closas et al 2008;Rudnik and Briassoulis 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%