2019
DOI: 10.34218/ijaret.10.6.2019.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Destructive and Non-Destructive Testing in Concrete Strength Assessment for a School Building

Abstract: The present paper aims to increase knowledge of the methods of resistance estimating of concrete in situ by means of non-destructive tests used to integrate the quantitative results from cylindrical specimens (core). The results of experimental investigations carried out on concrete conglomerate samples of a school building are shown. The experimental campaign then will be presented like a case study, conducted on a series of concrete beams and pillars of an existing building. The expression obtained through t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the study of the in-situ concrete compressive strength at the age 1926th day, 18 cores with a diameter (D) Ø100 mm and depth ranging of 151 mm to 156 mm were drilled from the reinforced concrete beams (Figure 2 -a, b) from places without visible on the surfaces cracks, pores, cavities, defects and reinforcement [28][29][30]. The measurements were with accuracy up to 1 mm.…”
Section: Test Specimens (Cores)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the study of the in-situ concrete compressive strength at the age 1926th day, 18 cores with a diameter (D) Ø100 mm and depth ranging of 151 mm to 156 mm were drilled from the reinforced concrete beams (Figure 2 -a, b) from places without visible on the surfaces cracks, pores, cavities, defects and reinforcement [28][29][30]. The measurements were with accuracy up to 1 mm.…”
Section: Test Specimens (Cores)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of these decisions at each stage of product quality enhancement directly impacts the overall quality and customer satisfaction (Alt et al, 2019;Ostasz et al, 2022a;Pacana et al, 2020;Siwiec et al, 2021cSiwiec et al, , 2021d. Initially, decisions are typically made after product quality control, often involving non-destructive testing (NDT) (Katunin et al, 2021;Krajewska-Śpiewak et al, 2021;Minutolo et al, 2019). However, these controls only identify incompatibilities and do not determine their root causes (Jarosińska & Berczyński, 2021;Khedmatgozar et al, 2021;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these tools were employed selectively during certain stages of the product quality management process. Furthermore, some of these tools are subjective in nature, as highlighted by Minutolo et al (2019). Interestingly, no previous attention has been given to the integration of multicriteria decision methods (MCDM) (Parkan & Wu, 2000) throughout the entire quality management process, alongside conventional quality management tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive chapter in the limit analysis is devoted to the mechanics of masonry structures following the work of Heyman [6], who extends the primary approach of limit analysis to the not tensile resistant materials (NTRM) modeling masonry. The limit analysis, and in a more general sense the plasticity modeling, is highly required when one must interpret the results of monitoring campaign since the structures during their life generally undergo permanent strain and cracks [7,8]. In the field of the biomechanics, the limit equilibrium is used as a primary tool to assess the fracture risk of prosthesis implants and relative optimization strategies as reported in [9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%