2019
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of dental pulp tests in children with dental trauma: a national survey of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry's members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Andersson et al 20 The appropriate timing of endodontic treatment for immature teeth has been difficult to judge for dentists. It is difficult to balance pulp revascularization against the possibility of pulp necrosis and in- [21][22][23][24] In agreement with previous studies, the present study observed a diminished likelihood of PDL healing with longer extra-alveolar periods. 15,16 Additionally, prolonged non-physiologic storage time of the teeth was more important to prognosis than the total extra-alveolar period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 Andersson et al 20 The appropriate timing of endodontic treatment for immature teeth has been difficult to judge for dentists. It is difficult to balance pulp revascularization against the possibility of pulp necrosis and in- [21][22][23][24] In agreement with previous studies, the present study observed a diminished likelihood of PDL healing with longer extra-alveolar periods. 15,16 Additionally, prolonged non-physiologic storage time of the teeth was more important to prognosis than the total extra-alveolar period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To avoid uncontrollable resorption, patients should be carefully reviewed. In addition, laser Doppler flowmetry might be helpful to assess the pulp state of immature teeth awaiting revascularization …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewing these teeth at 43 months showed a lower response to sensibility testing. The results of sensibility tests should be interpreted with caution as, albeit very popular (Ghouth et al 2019 ), are subjective, therefore, have compromised accuracy, especially in the child population. Recent systematic reviews (Ghouth et al 2018 ; Mainkar and Kim 2018 ) showed high specificity (0.93) and low sensitivity (0.72) when using the EPT and moderate specificity (0.84) and sensitivity (0.87) for cold tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review revealed a high risk of bias in studies with such favourable results (33). Technological refinement to fabrication of probes for improving tests performance is mandatory and has been recommended in several studies (17,32,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%