2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of cultured epithelial autograft in the treatment of major burn injuries: A critical review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
98
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the tissue-engineered constructs are grafted, vascularization of the dermal support remains a major challenge, limiting their survival and take rates, even when autologous cellular components are used [44]. In the present report, we observed that the grafted DPC-containing composite skin retained the living epidermis generated in vitro, and the DF-containing ones showed a dermal-epidermal detachment associated with a focal necrosis process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…When the tissue-engineered constructs are grafted, vascularization of the dermal support remains a major challenge, limiting their survival and take rates, even when autologous cellular components are used [44]. In the present report, we observed that the grafted DPC-containing composite skin retained the living epidermis generated in vitro, and the DF-containing ones showed a dermal-epidermal detachment associated with a focal necrosis process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Epidermis and keratinocyte suspensions have been assessed as treatment methods for chronic non-healing wounds [22,23]. Keratinocytes grafted on full-thickness wounds have yielded satisfactory results owing to rapid healing [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,14,15 Although dermal substitutes may provide wound coverage and reduce pain, they still require an epidermal component, which is often provided through one or more applications of split-thickness autografts, necessitating multiple surgical procedures that injure the donor site and increase scar morbidity. 16 On the other hand, cultured epithelial autografts without dermal component have shown unreliable take rate possibly owing to lack of adequate vascularization and produce an unstable epidermis that is prone to blistering or minor trauma. 17 Finally, substitutes with autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts require several weeks of culture for development before transplantation to the wound site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 However, vascularization of the dermal support remains a major challenge limiting the survival and take rate of the multilayered epithelial component. 16,17,24 Therefore, successful wound regeneration requires (1) fast wound coverage; (2) quick vascularization of the neodermis; and (3) full restoration of the epidermis with minimum culture time and no need for split-thickness autografts. In principle these requirements can be met by a two-step approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%