2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4934322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of copulas to practical estimation of multivariate stochastic differential equation mixed effects models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all SDE taper models (1)(2)(3)(4) used additional measurements, which fixed the tree diameter at stem height h = 0. Comparison of the statistical indices produced by the regression taper models (5-8; extra integral by Equation (39)) and the regression volume models (9)(10)(11)(12) revealed that the regression volume models were superior to the regression taper models. In Models 3 and 4, the random effects calibrated by Equation (30) (using two additional stem diameter observations measured at a stem height of 1.0 m and 1.5 m for all stems in the validation data set) improved all statistical indices for the volume predictions (see Validation Data Set columns in Table 4).…”
Section: Comparison Of Stem Volume Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, all SDE taper models (1)(2)(3)(4) used additional measurements, which fixed the tree diameter at stem height h = 0. Comparison of the statistical indices produced by the regression taper models (5-8; extra integral by Equation (39)) and the regression volume models (9)(10)(11)(12) revealed that the regression volume models were superior to the regression taper models. In Models 3 and 4, the random effects calibrated by Equation (30) (using two additional stem diameter observations measured at a stem height of 1.0 m and 1.5 m for all stems in the validation data set) improved all statistical indices for the volume predictions (see Validation Data Set columns in Table 4).…”
Section: Comparison Of Stem Volume Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All results are obtained in the Maple computer algebra system. Symmetry 2020, 12, 80 2 of 17 uses two joining points to link three stem sections along the bole, where each section is modeled by a different type of fixed-effect parameters SDE.Stochastic differential equations are widely used to model biological dynamical systems in which a stochasticity phenomenon plays a leading role, embracing more complex variations in the dynamics and generalizing classical ordinary differential equation models [10,11]. The analytical theory of univariate diffusion processes has been successfully utilized for modeling the growth dynamics of an even-age stand [12,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes stochastic modeling a powerful tool in the hands of practitioners in fields for which population growth is a critical determinant of various outcomes. There is a general tendency in the population growth modeling literature to favor flexible techniques that represent features of multivariate data as well as possible [10,11]. Therefore, multivariate SDEs describing population growth models contain both the main effects and interaction effects involved in models using a variance-covariance matrix, improving the potential to interpret the data more informatively [12] and inferring the causality in a statistical sense as a type of dependence of the multivariate random variables [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has been conducted on the utilization of various theoretical functions for height and diameter distribution modeling techniques for improving stand volume prediction, such as Johnson’s [45], beta distribution [6], and power-normal [3]. Recently, there were also a few results published on the use of the copula approach for the modeling of tree height and diameter distribution in stands [7], [8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%