2001
DOI: 10.1054/bjps.2000.3471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of conventional and invaginated autologous vein grafts for nerve repair by means of entubulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors used a vein graft as a conduit to provide a scaffold for BMSCs and to facilitate Schwann cell migration. The vein has been utilized as a conduit to repair segmental nerve tissue loss which proved to be supportive conduit for peripheral nerve axonal regeneration and maturity 1,2,19,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors used a vein graft as a conduit to provide a scaffold for BMSCs and to facilitate Schwann cell migration. The vein has been utilized as a conduit to repair segmental nerve tissue loss which proved to be supportive conduit for peripheral nerve axonal regeneration and maturity 1,2,19,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Wang et al 3 supported the contention that the inside-out vein technique conferred not only structural but also functional benefit, Kelleher et al 38 found that the superior morphometric results seen in the inside-out group were not matched by improved functional recovery over standard vein, as measured by electrophysiological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Although this technique showed promise, it was not as successful as hoped, with some published data finding no significant difference between standard and inside-out veins. 12,13 Arteries were first successfully used as nerve guides by Bungner in 1891. 14 Although chemically similar to veins, several physical characteristics such as wall thickness, permeability, and mechanical rigidity differ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%