2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-419x(00)00021-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of common genetic polymorphisms to enhance the epidemiologic study of environmental carcinogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these assumptions, 80% to 90% of all cancers have determinants such as viruses, soot and fumes inhaled, food and pollutants ingested, as well as chemical substances and radiations, which affect human body. 27 Such inferences are consistent with studies on migrant groups. The first-generation of Japanese immigrants in the city of São Paulo revealed incidence patterns for some cancers distinct from those of the Japanese people and closer to the Brazilian population.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…According to these assumptions, 80% to 90% of all cancers have determinants such as viruses, soot and fumes inhaled, food and pollutants ingested, as well as chemical substances and radiations, which affect human body. 27 Such inferences are consistent with studies on migrant groups. The first-generation of Japanese immigrants in the city of São Paulo revealed incidence patterns for some cancers distinct from those of the Japanese people and closer to the Brazilian population.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is also a debate over whether combining multiple genotypes will increase the predictive value of tests that involve them. In addition to identifying high-risk individuals, genetic biomarkers can lead to a more robust understanding of occupational and environmental determinants of disease relevant to whole populations, and not simply to genetically susceptible subpopulations (70,71).…”
Section: From High Output To High Throughputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es ist nicht ungewöhnlich, dass eine erste FallKontroll-Studie das Risiko einer Erkrankung im Zusammenhang mit einer Sequenzvariation eines FME überschätzt, während die folgenden größer angelegten Studien diesen Zusammenhang nicht bestätigen können [40]. Nicht nur für Assoziationsstudien im Bereich der FME wurde darauf hingewiesen, dass häufig die erste Studie eine starke Assoziation feststellt und in hochrangigen Zeitschriften publiziert wird, während diese Assoziationen mit der Veröffentlichung von weiteren Studien und dem Anwachsen der verfügbaren Daten schwächer wird oder gar ganz verschwindet [4].…”
Section: üBerlegungen Zum Krebsrisikounclassified