1982
DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(82)90069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of chlorhexidine in catheter bags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adherence to the closed drainage system minimizes the importance of the drainage bag as the source of CA-bacteriuria and thus the usefulness of drainage bag disinfection [273]. Because of the potential role of contaminated drainage bags in infection clusters [58,63], it may be appropriate to consider drainage bag disinfection as an infection prevention measure during nosocomial outbreaks [275,276], but this has not been evaluated in randomized trials.…”
Section: Evidence Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence to the closed drainage system minimizes the importance of the drainage bag as the source of CA-bacteriuria and thus the usefulness of drainage bag disinfection [273]. Because of the potential role of contaminated drainage bags in infection clusters [58,63], it may be appropriate to consider drainage bag disinfection as an infection prevention measure during nosocomial outbreaks [275,276], but this has not been evaluated in randomized trials.…”
Section: Evidence Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference was that 20cc chlorhexidine was added to the urine bag after disposal of contents and two more specimens were taken daily from the drainage bag (one in the morning and one at night). Eight hundred and eighty-seven urine cultures were tested (Noy et al 1982, Webb & Blandh 1968.…”
Section: Group I L Lmentioning
confidence: 99%