2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04129.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of cell salvage during radical retropubic prostatectomy: does it influence cancer recurrence?

Abstract: blood using a commercial cell saver; 264 receiving only autologous transfusion; and 57 with no transfusion. Disease recurrence was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >0.2 ng/mL. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess and compare the risk of cancer recurrence in the three groups. Covariates used in the multivariate analyses included Gleason score, preoperative PSA level, seminal vesicle involvement and surgical margins. RESULTSThe mean (range) follow-up wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All the in-vivo evidence has shown that cancer patients receiving cell salvaged blood do not get increased rates of recurrences or increased mortality, and there has been considerable clinical use of cell salvage in all types of cancer surgeryparticularly urology, over the last 20 years. Up to 2003 the evidence consisted of a small number of case reports and observational studies [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], and has been criticised as a result [50]. However, they do show no difference in recurrence rate with intra-operative cell salvage or a better outcome compared with allogeneic transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the in-vivo evidence has shown that cancer patients receiving cell salvaged blood do not get increased rates of recurrences or increased mortality, and there has been considerable clinical use of cell salvage in all types of cancer surgeryparticularly urology, over the last 20 years. Up to 2003 the evidence consisted of a small number of case reports and observational studies [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], and has been criticised as a result [50]. However, they do show no difference in recurrence rate with intra-operative cell salvage or a better outcome compared with allogeneic transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that the presence of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in a resected specimen is an unfavourable prognostic factor in prostate cancer [1][2][3]. SVI has been reported in 5-13.6% of recent radical prostatectomy specimens [4][5][6]. Various studies have assessed the prediction of recurrence and prognosis in patients with prostate cancer and SVI treated by radical prostatectomy.…”
Section: Standardization Of Radical Cystectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Lastly, autologous blood recovery (CellSaver) is the reinfusion of blood lost during the operation, which is collected, filtered, washed, processed and re-transfused, but is controversial among urologists due to theoretical risks of cancer dissemination. 16,18 Interestingly, experienced urologists use these techniques more commonly than less experienced surgeons. The reasons for this association are unknown.…”
Section: Acute Normovolemic Hemodilutionmentioning
confidence: 99%