2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of cell salvage in women undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal placentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…83,84 Whilst cell salvage and retransfusion are viewed as relatively expensive and labor intensive, autologous cell salvage is now being adopted in many obstetric centers managing PAS disorders, with observational studies showing improved outcomes and reduced need for allogenic blood transfusion, without an increase in adverse outcomes. [84][85][86] Regarding cost analysis, a recent study demonstrated that intraoperative cell salvage during cesarean delivery for invasive placentation justified its use where the probability of requiring packed red cell transfusion of two units was 75%. 87 It is important that suctioned contaminants are kept to an absolute minimum, including amniotic fluid, vernix, microorganisms, fetal blood, and exogenous surgical solutions such as contemporary hemostatics.…”
Section: Cell Salvagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…83,84 Whilst cell salvage and retransfusion are viewed as relatively expensive and labor intensive, autologous cell salvage is now being adopted in many obstetric centers managing PAS disorders, with observational studies showing improved outcomes and reduced need for allogenic blood transfusion, without an increase in adverse outcomes. [84][85][86] Regarding cost analysis, a recent study demonstrated that intraoperative cell salvage during cesarean delivery for invasive placentation justified its use where the probability of requiring packed red cell transfusion of two units was 75%. 87 It is important that suctioned contaminants are kept to an absolute minimum, including amniotic fluid, vernix, microorganisms, fetal blood, and exogenous surgical solutions such as contemporary hemostatics.…”
Section: Cell Salvagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elagamy et al conducted a prospective observational study on 41 patients with placenta accreta and the role of cell saver technology in reducing allogenic transfusion (24). They found that their cell saver cohort that the mean volume of re-infused salvaged blood was 1476 cc and that 87% of their cohort did not require allogenic red blood cell transfusion.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Despite this growing challenge facing obstetrical care providers, there is no clear consensus on the range of effective measures that should be used at the time of caesarean hysterectomy in order to prevent massive blood loss. Though contemporary non-surgical measures such as the administration of tranexamic acid 6,7 and the use of cell-saver equipment 8,9 are both indicated and effective, the optimal method of reducing the principal uterine vascularity during surgery remains elusive. 10 The aim of the present study was to compare surgical outcomes between two devascularization techniques at the time of caesarean hysterectomy in women with pathologically confirmed PAS disorders: prophylactic internal iliac artery surgical ligation (Ligation) and prophylactic preoperative endovascular internal iliac artery balloon placement (Balloon).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%