2014
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2013.846284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of BISAC in Libraries as New Cases of Reader-Interest Classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As collection sizes shrink and materials arrive cataloged and shelf-ready, technical service departments have all but disappeared, taking with them those large support staffs once needed for managing an intensely artifact-based service. Furthermore, in some jurisdictions, the move away from the Dewey Decimal Classification system to “Dewey-free” systems such as BISAC (aka the bookstore model) while affording customers more independence, has ramifications for a number of professional competencies, not the least of which is local cataloging (Martínez-Ávila, 2014). These changes need to be considered in conjunction with the growing interest in “demand-driven acquisitions” models for print and e-books, which clearly impinges upon collection development as professional practice.…”
Section: Section 2: Concrete Manifestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As collection sizes shrink and materials arrive cataloged and shelf-ready, technical service departments have all but disappeared, taking with them those large support staffs once needed for managing an intensely artifact-based service. Furthermore, in some jurisdictions, the move away from the Dewey Decimal Classification system to “Dewey-free” systems such as BISAC (aka the bookstore model) while affording customers more independence, has ramifications for a number of professional competencies, not the least of which is local cataloging (Martínez-Ávila, 2014). These changes need to be considered in conjunction with the growing interest in “demand-driven acquisitions” models for print and e-books, which clearly impinges upon collection development as professional practice.…”
Section: Section 2: Concrete Manifestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accepting that the concept and terminology of readerinterest classifications has transformed and changed over time, despite its variations, it still shows an agreed-upon core of characteristics shaping its meaning and allowing its conceptualization. As pointed out by Martínez-Ávila (2012), some of these characteristics of reader-interest classifications include: dropping traditional practices like Dewey; using alphabetical/natural language categories for the physical arrangement of materials; organizing and representing knowledge according to topics of interest instead of academic disciplines; carrying out the classification process at the book selection service instead of the cataloging service and all that difference implies; and accepting the influence of bookstore practices in such diverse aspects as guiding, signage, and display. Among the alleged advantages of reader-interest classifications projects are: meeting the user's needs (by gathering together materials of interest that had been previously dispersed by Dewey), reversibility of the experiments, the possibility of putting different changes and innovations into effect at one time (although sometimes these are impossible to separate or even identify clearly and not always related to the classification scheme), the cost saving (including aspects such as the acquisition of cheap formats), greater shelving flexibility, improved adequacy for browsing, increase in circulation, and a good method of identification in the most demanded areas for stock control purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Recent analyses of these reader-interest arrangements in relation to current bookstore-like classifications such as BISAC include Martínez-Ávila (2012), Martínez-Ávila and San Segundo (2013), and Martínez-Ávila et al (2014). In relation to BISAC, Martínez-Ávila also proposed the concept of "Market Warrant" (Martínez-Ávila, 2012Martínez-Ávila and Kipp, 2014). According to Martínez-Ávila (2016), "market warrant" would be "the justification for the inclusion of terms in a controlled vocabulary based on publishing activities and current market demands" (p. 658).…”
Section: Other Warrants In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%