2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5389820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Biomarkers in Early Diagnostics of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal solid malignancies with increasing incidence. The poor prognosis is due to the aggressive nature of the tumor, late detection, and the resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A radical surgery procedure is the only treatment that has been shown to improve the 5-year survival rate to 20-25%. However, the majority of patients (80-85%) are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease and just 15-20% patients are diagnosed in an early … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, patients who are negative for Lewis antigen a or b (approximately 10% of patients with PDAC) are unable to synthesize CA 19-9 even in advanced stages of the disease. Although measurement of serum CA 19-9 levels is useful in patients with known pancreatic cancer, the application of this biomarker as a screening tool revealed disappointing results and is not recommended as a screening marker for PDAC [46,47,51]. Our working group recently identified a metabolite-based biomarker signature, which distinguishes PDAC from CP with much greater accuracy than CA 19-9 alone [52].…”
Section: Opportunities Of Metabolic Profiles To Develop Targeted Thermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, patients who are negative for Lewis antigen a or b (approximately 10% of patients with PDAC) are unable to synthesize CA 19-9 even in advanced stages of the disease. Although measurement of serum CA 19-9 levels is useful in patients with known pancreatic cancer, the application of this biomarker as a screening tool revealed disappointing results and is not recommended as a screening marker for PDAC [46,47,51]. Our working group recently identified a metabolite-based biomarker signature, which distinguishes PDAC from CP with much greater accuracy than CA 19-9 alone [52].…”
Section: Opportunities Of Metabolic Profiles To Develop Targeted Thermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the other potential protein-based biomarkers for early PDAC detection, including cell migration-inducing hyaluronan binding protein (CEMIP), C4b-binding protein α-chain (C4BPA), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) [ 30 ], could theoretically be targeted by aptamers, too. Due to a lack of large prospective clinical trials, aptamer-based biosensors directed against potential tumor biomarkers are currently only established for VEGF, a key player of angiogenesis and metastasis formation in various cancer entities [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is an urgent need for the identification of some other parameter or method which could distinguish between the two types of head masses confirmatively. There are also studies looking into the proteome profile of pancreatic cancer and pancreatitis but with not much success [ 8 , 9 ]. Analysis of transcriptome has also been used to distinguish benign and malignant lesions in other cancers [ 10 , 11 ], but such studies directly addressing issues with benign and malignant pancreatic head masses are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%