2019
DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2019.010116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Bayesian Hierarchical Logistic Regression in the Development of a Modular Viral Inactivation Claim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete survey is available online as Supporting Information to this article. The survey included questions related to respondent 21 Gelman et al (2004) 22 Sivaganesan et al (2008) 23 Peterson and Yahyah (2009) Feng et al (2011) 25 Rozet et al (2011) 26 Novick et al (2012) 27 Lebrun et al (2013) 28 Fronczyk and Kottas (2014) 29 Rozet et al (2015) 30 Muleme et al (2016) 31 Sondag et al (2016) 32 Novick et al (2018) 33 Yang and Novick (2019) 34 Lebrun and Rozet (2020) 35 Process development Peterson (2004) 36 Miro-Quesada et al (2004) 37 Peterson (2008) 38 Peterson et al (2009) 39 Peterson and Lief (2010) 40 Mockus et al (2011) 41 Woodward (2011) 42 Lebrun et al (2012) 43 Hubert et al (2014) 44 Lebrun et al (2015) 45 Mockus et al (2015) 46 Lebrun et al (2018) 47 Boulanger and Mutsvari (2020) 50 Sano et al (2020) 48 Tabora et al (2019) 49 Yang and Novick (2019) 34 Process validation Yang (2013) 51 LeBlond and Mockus (2014) Faya et al (2017) 13 Yang and Novick (2019) 34 Peterson (2020) 53 Process control/manufacturing Mockus et al (2011) 54 Yang and Zhang (2016) 55 Novick et al (2017) 56 Faya et al (2017) 57 Yu et al (2017) 58 Banton et al (2019) 59 Overstall et al (2019)…”
Section: Bayesian Survey 21 | Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete survey is available online as Supporting Information to this article. The survey included questions related to respondent 21 Gelman et al (2004) 22 Sivaganesan et al (2008) 23 Peterson and Yahyah (2009) Feng et al (2011) 25 Rozet et al (2011) 26 Novick et al (2012) 27 Lebrun et al (2013) 28 Fronczyk and Kottas (2014) 29 Rozet et al (2015) 30 Muleme et al (2016) 31 Sondag et al (2016) 32 Novick et al (2018) 33 Yang and Novick (2019) 34 Lebrun and Rozet (2020) 35 Process development Peterson (2004) 36 Miro-Quesada et al (2004) 37 Peterson (2008) 38 Peterson et al (2009) 39 Peterson and Lief (2010) 40 Mockus et al (2011) 41 Woodward (2011) 42 Lebrun et al (2012) 43 Hubert et al (2014) 44 Lebrun et al (2015) 45 Mockus et al (2015) 46 Lebrun et al (2018) 47 Boulanger and Mutsvari (2020) 50 Sano et al (2020) 48 Tabora et al (2019) 49 Yang and Novick (2019) 34 Process validation Yang (2013) 51 LeBlond and Mockus (2014) Faya et al (2017) 13 Yang and Novick (2019) 34 Peterson (2020) 53 Process control/manufacturing Mockus et al (2011) 54 Yang and Zhang (2016) 55 Novick et al (2017) 56 Faya et al (2017) 57 Yu et al (2017) 58 Banton et al (2019) 59 Overstall et al (2019)…”
Section: Bayesian Survey 21 | Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attempts have been made in the past to analyze such data with traditional statistical methods. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The current work focuses on evaluating the usefulness of machine learning methods to support the development of processes for viral clearance of biological therapeutic molecules. Specifically, a case study is presented for low pH viral inactivation unit operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attempts have been made in the past to analyze such data with traditional statistical methods 7‐10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%