The Use of Aviation Safety Practices in UAS Operations: A Review

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Systems, UAS, have rapidly become a part of the US National Airspace System (NAS) with more than 1.6 million registered between 2015 and 2020. As the number of UAS has increased so has the number of sightings by manned aircraft and airport operators. This increase in sightings has raised concerns about the safety of UAS operations, a concern validated by the experiences of the US military. Following high accident/incident rates during UAS operation the US military discovered that UAS, despite having no pilot onboard, are subject to human error. The research and methods to minimize human error are mature, widely integrated, and successful in manned aviation. This paper presents a literature review of three aviation safety practices and their use in UAS operations. Science Direct and the Web of Science Core Collection databases were reviewed for articles with the keywords "Crew Resource Management", "Safety Management Systems", or "Standard Operating Procedures" and "Unmanned Aerial System" or "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle." One hundred and sixteen articles containing these keywords were published between 2000-2020. Each of the discovered articles were downloaded and reviewed by two researchers. This review discovered that six articles discuss the use of either CRM, SMS, or SOPs in UAS operations, which suggests a need for a greater body of UAS research in these areas. This void in research mirrors the early integration approach taken by the US military, and the consequence of the knowledge gap was an increased accident rate. Additional research must be conducted to understand the effect of human error on civilian UAS operations to allow for the safe operation of UAS in the US NAS.

Autonomous aerial robotics for package delivery: A technical review

“…Human factors play a significant role in the safety of UAVs. Multiple practices and standards aid in reducing the risk associated with human factors which include crew resource management, standard operating procedures, and safety management systems (Weldon et al, 2021). These procedures are standard within the aviation industry, but more literature is required to understand how these standards can be applied to delivery UAVs.…”

Adaptive structures for noise and vibration guidance, monitoring, and control

“…The number of often fatal accidents occurring every year in some way highlights the severity of the problem, made even more dramatic by the current climate change [15]- [16]. A good chunk of adverse weather accidents, more than 10%, is due to ice accretions [17]. The schematic of Figure 11, in its simplicity, illustrates the devasting effects of icing, ranging from a sudden loss of lift and thrust to an increase of drag and weight.…”

The Current State of Safety Reporting in Unmanned Aircraft Maintenance and Manufacturing: An Opportunity for Improvement

“…The Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Public Safety stated in 2018 that "the issues of UAS legality, safety, and technology are just now beginning to be explored, largely because of the scarcity of data available. Key to the evaluation process is the process of reporting and data collection" (GAO, 2019;Greenwood, 2021;Speijker, 2018;sUAS in Public Safety, 2018;Weldon et al, 2022). The FAA established a Part 107 accident reporting system through its UAS-specific website, FAA DroneZone (14 CFR Part 107, 2021).…”

“…Fast forward to today when UAS operations are increasing exponentially and close to 863,000 UAS are registered in the United States (FAA, 2021d). With the influx of UAS operations, there is a need for a more robust safety reporting process for UAS manufacturers and maintenance providers (GAO, 2019;Greenwood, 2021;Speijker, 2018;Weldon et al, 2021).…”