2015 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pcs.2015.7170048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of asymmetric numeral systems as an accurate replacement for Huffman coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SAM to BAM conversion requires relatively less computation since it uses gzip along with some preprocessing. The version of Scramble used in the experiments uses the range-coder variant of the Asymmetric Numerical System, which has been shown to be faster than arithmetic encoding [16]. Our compression and decompression times are middle-of-the-pack.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAM to BAM conversion requires relatively less computation since it uses gzip along with some preprocessing. The version of Scramble used in the experiments uses the range-coder variant of the Asymmetric Numerical System, which has been shown to be faster than arithmetic encoding [16]. Our compression and decompression times are middle-of-the-pack.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern lossless compression is mainly based on two approaches to entropy coding: Huffman coding (HC) and arithmetic coding (AC) [18]. Later, the Asymmetric numeral systems approach was introduced with a high performance of combining the fast speed of Huffman with the high compression rate of arithmetic coding [19].…”
Section: Lossless Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, zStandard also makes use a of a faster and more effective method for evaluating entropy, known as Asymmetric Numeral System (ANS), than classic compression algorithms. ANS significantly improves compression ratio in data with large degrees of randomness (Duda, 2013, andDuda et al, 2015).…”
Section: Blocked Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%