2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Assistive Technology to Promote Care of the Self and Social Inclusion in Patients with Sequels of Leprosy

Abstract: BackgroundThis study is about the contribution of occupational therapy inside a rehabilitation group, and we focus on the autonomy of patients with disabilities due to leprosy. There are few studies on the use of assistive technology by leprosy patients; to our knowledge, none of them aim to have a subjective approach of care. Our purpose was to analyze the repercussions of assistive technology on autonomy of care of the self in patients with sequels of leprosy.MethodsA qualitative, descriptive exploratory stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These interventions engage at the intrapersonal level—seeking to counter internalised stigma—as well as at interpersonal and community level. With respect to NTDs, these commonly include self-care and self-help (Pryce et al 2018 ), educational programmes (Correia et al 2019 ), assistive technology (Maia et al 2016 ), and community engagement approaches (Jung et al 2020 ). Other measures against stigmatisation tend to be health education for patients and the community (Zeldenryk et al 2011 ) and disease management, yet the effectiveness of these measures has not been demonstrated in the literature (Hofstraat and van Brakel 2016 ).…”
Section: Countering Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interventions engage at the intrapersonal level—seeking to counter internalised stigma—as well as at interpersonal and community level. With respect to NTDs, these commonly include self-care and self-help (Pryce et al 2018 ), educational programmes (Correia et al 2019 ), assistive technology (Maia et al 2016 ), and community engagement approaches (Jung et al 2020 ). Other measures against stigmatisation tend to be health education for patients and the community (Zeldenryk et al 2011 ) and disease management, yet the effectiveness of these measures has not been demonstrated in the literature (Hofstraat and van Brakel 2016 ).…”
Section: Countering Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most the patients who accepted and adopted a personalized assistive device showed improved or stable performance of denture brushing or mouthwash. Previous study with leprosy patients showed that to provide devices to them, that allow the care of the self, can contribute to preservation of the independence [ 18 , 19 ] and social inclusion [ 18 ]. It was observed too that the use of the devices has an impact in the rescue of the abilities lost with the evolution of the leprosy disabilities [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some elders related that is easier to perform the relevant tasks without their device or had difficulty incorporating something new into their routine. Previous studies have identified several reasons why older people are reluctant to use assistive technology devices: frustration at having to use them, because the need for them is an indication of their limitations, lack of interest in learning how to use them, poor aesthetic quality, shame and denial of disability [ 18 , 30 – 35 ]. In our study the patients’ failure to use the devices provided for them may also be attributed to the fact that many of them feel tired as a consequence of their diseases and the functional limitations caused by their physical deformities and did not want to worry about inserting another new activity or process into their daily life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nessa perspectiva, as pesquisas foram orientadas para o uso da tecnologia assistiva no auxílio ao cotidiano das pessoas, sua inclusão social ou como instrumento em cirurgias dessas patologias (BARBOSA, et al, 2014;GUIMARÃES et al, 2016;BARBOSA, et al, 2016;MUNIZ et al, 2016;MAIA et al, 2016;ALVAREZ et al, 2017;GAMA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Figura 4 -Público Alvo Abordado Nos Artigos Indexadosunclassified