Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Steam injection is an effective heavy oil recovery method, however, poses several environmental concerns. Solvent injection methods are introduced in an attempt to combat these environmental concerns. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of a new solvent (VisRed) in the recovery of a Canadian bitumen and compares its results with toluene. While VisRed is selected due to its high effectiveness as a viscosity reducer even at very low concentrations, toluene is selected due to its high solvent power. Five core flooding experiments were conducted; E1 (Steam flooding), E2 (VisRed flooding), E3 (Toluene flooding), E4 (Steam + Toluene flooding), and E5 (Steam + VisRed flooding). Core samples were prepared by saturating 60% of the pore space with oil samples and 40% with deionized water. The solvents were injected at a 2 ml/min rate, while steam was injected at a 18 ml/min cold water equivalent rate. Produced oil and water samples were collected every 20 min during every experiment. The oil recovery efficiencies of the core flood experiments were analyzed by the emulsion characterization in the produced fluids and the residual oil analysis on the spent rock samples. The best oil recovery of ~30 vol % was obtained for E2 (VisRed) in which VisRed was injected alone. Although similar cumulative recoveries were obtained both for E2 (VisRed) and E3 (Toluene), the amount of VisRed injected [~1 pore volumes (PV)] was half the volume required by toluene (~2 PV). The produced oil quality variations are mainly due to the formation of the water-in-oil emulsions during mainly steam processes (E1, E4, and E5). The increased amount of the polar fractions in the produced oil enhances the formation of the emulsions. These polar fractions are namely asphaltenes and resins. As the amount of the polar fractions in the produce oil increases, more water-in-oil emulsion formation is observed due to the polar-polar interaction between crude oil fractions and water. Consequently, E1 and E5 resulted in more water in oil emulsions. The cost analysis also shows the effectiveness of solvent recovery over steam-solvent recovery processes.
Steam injection is an effective heavy oil recovery method, however, poses several environmental concerns. Solvent injection methods are introduced in an attempt to combat these environmental concerns. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of a new solvent (VisRed) in the recovery of a Canadian bitumen and compares its results with toluene. While VisRed is selected due to its high effectiveness as a viscosity reducer even at very low concentrations, toluene is selected due to its high solvent power. Five core flooding experiments were conducted; E1 (Steam flooding), E2 (VisRed flooding), E3 (Toluene flooding), E4 (Steam + Toluene flooding), and E5 (Steam + VisRed flooding). Core samples were prepared by saturating 60% of the pore space with oil samples and 40% with deionized water. The solvents were injected at a 2 ml/min rate, while steam was injected at a 18 ml/min cold water equivalent rate. Produced oil and water samples were collected every 20 min during every experiment. The oil recovery efficiencies of the core flood experiments were analyzed by the emulsion characterization in the produced fluids and the residual oil analysis on the spent rock samples. The best oil recovery of ~30 vol % was obtained for E2 (VisRed) in which VisRed was injected alone. Although similar cumulative recoveries were obtained both for E2 (VisRed) and E3 (Toluene), the amount of VisRed injected [~1 pore volumes (PV)] was half the volume required by toluene (~2 PV). The produced oil quality variations are mainly due to the formation of the water-in-oil emulsions during mainly steam processes (E1, E4, and E5). The increased amount of the polar fractions in the produced oil enhances the formation of the emulsions. These polar fractions are namely asphaltenes and resins. As the amount of the polar fractions in the produce oil increases, more water-in-oil emulsion formation is observed due to the polar-polar interaction between crude oil fractions and water. Consequently, E1 and E5 resulted in more water in oil emulsions. The cost analysis also shows the effectiveness of solvent recovery over steam-solvent recovery processes.
Global oil consumption is predicted to increase by 15% from 2021 to 2050. The increasing oil demand and decreasing conventional oil supply force us to find alternate energy supplies. The key to this problem lies with the vast untapped heavy oil and bitumen resources. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of an environmentally friendly solvent, limonene, in recovering heavy oil. Three core flood experiments representing three different recovery methods were carried out. These include steam flooding (E1), solvent flooding (E2), and solvent-steam co-injections (E3). The green solvent, limonene, is a citrus-based non-toxic solvent. It was chosen due to its high organic solvency and ready availability. Throughout the experiments, steam was injected at a cold water equivalent of 18 ml/min, while limonene was injected at 2 ml/min. The experiments were run with a back pressure of 45-55 psi. The core pack was prepared by filling the pore space of Ottawa sand with a 60% heavy oil sample and 40% water by volume (including water percentage in oil). Produced oil and water samples were collected every 20 min during the experiments. These samples were further analyzed by emulsion characterization to determine emulsion stability and oil quality. Spent rock analyses were done to calculate the displacement efficiency of each of the experiments. In addition, an economic analysis was done to determine the optimal recovery method. Spent rock analysis showed that a sole injection of limonene (E2) had the highest oil recovery. This confirms the high organic solvency of limonene achieved miscible flooding producing about 46 vol % from a total of 60 vol % initial oil. Steam flooding (E1), on the other hand, did not perform as well, producing around 29 vol %. The post-mortem sample from E1 indicated asphaltene precipitation which could have lowered oil recovery. Co-injection of limonene and steam was expected to yield the highest recovery due to the presence of two active drive mechanisms, thermal and miscible flooding. However, it performed comparatively less (41 vol %) than a sole injection of limonene (E2). This is further explained with emulsion characterization results. Experiments involving steam (E1 and E2) revealed strong emulsions in the oil produced, indicating a lower quality. Furthermore, it was seen that the solvent-steam process produced weaker emulsions compared to steam flooding alone. On the other hand, solvent flooding (E2) produced high-quality oil with little to no emulsions. These results along with the economic analysis, indicate that the optimal recovery method would be solvent flooding (E2). Our results prove that limonene is a promising organic solvent. Limonene is non-toxic, readily available, and safe to handle. As a result, it can be a safe green alternative to commonly used toxic organic solvents such as toluene.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.