2016
DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2016.1184876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Artificial Neural Networks in Projectile Point Typology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where such methods have been applied, they have generally been used to search for patterns in 2-dimensional image data derived via remote sensing [49,50] or during material provenance analysis [51]. With the exception of Nash and Prewitt's [52] pioneering study of Texas projectile point typology, we are aware of no other published research using ANNs to classify archaeological lithic assemblages.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where such methods have been applied, they have generally been used to search for patterns in 2-dimensional image data derived via remote sensing [49,50] or during material provenance analysis [51]. With the exception of Nash and Prewitt's [52] pioneering study of Texas projectile point typology, we are aware of no other published research using ANNs to classify archaeological lithic assemblages.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the ability to quantify patterns of morphological variation, even in minor and somewhat idiosyncratic aspects of the morphology, was generally held to be superior to more holistic qualitative "analyses" that relied on the visual inspection of aspects of the morphologies in question, performed by highly trained and experienced morphologists, but which were not susceptible to probabilistic hypothesis testing. With the advent of widespread image digitization, the increase in the power of even modestly priced computer platforms, and most importantly the development of more generalized computer vision-based morphological analysis algorithms, an effective synthesis between the qualitative Gestalt and quantitative morphometric approaches to morphological analysis has now been achieved [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]73]. Our results, along with others published recently (e.g., [32,[34][35][36][37]), illustrate how new and generalized approaches to morphological analyses make it possible to assess patterns of variation in any aspect of an organism's morphology, in any sample for which images can be obtained, irrespective of complexity and without forcing the analyst to make a priori decisions regarding which aspects of the morphologies in question to measure, compare, model, or interpret.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this investigation, we conducted a search for sexually dimorphic form differences using a small sample of modern gray wolf crania collected from northern Israel and the Golan Heights (henceforth “Israeli wolves”) for the purpose of determining whether recent developments in the field of geometric morphometrics and computer vision (e.g., [ 30 – 33 ]) could support more exploratory and confirmatory approaches to the analysis of sexual dimorphism in carnivore skeletons. Previous applications of this approach have proved useful in social media [ 34 ] and the scientific fields of entomology, where they have, in part, been employed to discover an unexpectedly strong set of sexually dimorphic differences in the morphology of fly wings [ 35 ], in the study of Mullerian mimicry in butterflies [ 36 ], and in archeology where they have been used to assess both temporal [ 32 ] and regional geographic differences [ 37 ] in the forms of lithic artifacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age group distribution was as follows: most respondents (47) fall into age group 15-30 years old, 25 respondents are between 30 and 45 years old, eleven were over 45 years old, the rest were under 15 years old. The education distribution of the respondents is as follows: primary school (9), middle school (30), high school (11) and university education (24). The last two questions in the general section of the survey were about TV watching habits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee [29] defined class sensitivity and specificity for multiclass classification problem. Average class sensitivity/specificity is then used as classification quality measure [30]. ROC AUC plots (the true positive versus false positive rate) as the classifier's performance measure also have to be generalized for multiclass problems [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%