1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)82881-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of an automatic on-line system for monitoring penicillin cultivation in a bubble-colum loop reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key advantages of sample removal were that some interfering substances were removed from broth via sample pretreatment and sterilization of the sensor itself was avoided (Lüdi et al, 1992), permitting use of biosensors which previously had limited in situ application due to their heat sensitivity (Schügerl, 2001). These sampling systems were either located externally to the fermenter or more recently utilized steam-sterilizable filtration probes situated inside the fermenter containing micro/ultra-filtration membranes (e.g., polysulfone, polycarbonate, hydrophilized polypropylene) of appropriate molecular weight cut-offs to avoid particle introduction into the analyzer (Chase, 1986;Möller et al, 1986;Niehoff et al, 1986;Rank et al, 1992) or automated centrifugation (Turner et al, 1993(Turner et al, , 1994. When cell broth was sampled for intracellular enzyme activity measurements, a reliable and automated method of cell wall permeabilization (Ahlmann et al, 1986;Blankenstein and Kula, 1991) or cell wall disintegration (Steube and Spohn, 1994) was required.…”
Section: Vibrio Matriegens Bacillus Thuringensismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key advantages of sample removal were that some interfering substances were removed from broth via sample pretreatment and sterilization of the sensor itself was avoided (Lüdi et al, 1992), permitting use of biosensors which previously had limited in situ application due to their heat sensitivity (Schügerl, 2001). These sampling systems were either located externally to the fermenter or more recently utilized steam-sterilizable filtration probes situated inside the fermenter containing micro/ultra-filtration membranes (e.g., polysulfone, polycarbonate, hydrophilized polypropylene) of appropriate molecular weight cut-offs to avoid particle introduction into the analyzer (Chase, 1986;Möller et al, 1986;Niehoff et al, 1986;Rank et al, 1992) or automated centrifugation (Turner et al, 1993(Turner et al, , 1994. When cell broth was sampled for intracellular enzyme activity measurements, a reliable and automated method of cell wall permeabilization (Ahlmann et al, 1986;Blankenstein and Kula, 1991) or cell wall disintegration (Steube and Spohn, 1994) was required.…”
Section: Vibrio Matriegens Bacillus Thuringensismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of automatic on-line systems for monitoring fermentation processes has been widely cited in the literature [11,[161][162][163][164][165]; however, these authors have not mentioned FIA by name, but they talk about autoanalysers, especially those based on air-segmented flow [166] and which are commercially available [167,168].…”
Section: Sampling Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%