2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Acellular Urinary Bladder Matrix As Coverage for Fasciocutaneous Free Flap Donor Sites: An Alternative to Traditional Grafting Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have shown porcine UBM to allow full wound epithelialization as soon as 5 to 8 weeks postoperatively. 14 Additionally, as the authors have previously mentioned, spontaneous granulation of an exenterated socket can take around 5 months. 2,8 In this case, the process was longer, with anterior socket epithelialization noted between 14 to 17 weeks, and complete socket epithelialization seen at 27 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous reports have shown porcine UBM to allow full wound epithelialization as soon as 5 to 8 weeks postoperatively. 14 Additionally, as the authors have previously mentioned, spontaneous granulation of an exenterated socket can take around 5 months. 2,8 In this case, the process was longer, with anterior socket epithelialization noted between 14 to 17 weeks, and complete socket epithelialization seen at 27 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[5][6][7] Moreover, the physicochemical properties of UBM offer attachment sites for cell surface receptors and a reservoir for signalling factors that modulate various wound healing processes, such as angiogenesis, cell migration, and proliferation. 3,5,8 In conclusion, we have described a novel application of the use of a commerciallyavailable decellularised urinary bladder extracellular matrix in the reconstruction of a post-oncological maxillectomy defect creating a prosthetically favourable site for dental rehabilitation and also without the dependence of a patient on a prosthetic obturator due to the absence of an oroantral fistula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%