The use of a Spanish-translated PrEP Stigma Scale among the Latino sample of the UNITE cohort study.

Abstract

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-related stigma is linked to inadequate PrEP uptake, yet there are no validated scales to test this association among Spanish-speaking Latino sexual minority men (SMM). The present study examined if the Spanish-translated PrEP Stigma Scale (PSS) was psychometrically appropriate for implementing in Spanish language-dominant Latino SMM. Recruitment was conducted using geosocial networking applications, social media sites, and email blasts (N = 3,049). First, we utilized item response theory (IRT) modeling to evaluate the reliability of the PSS items and the latent construct across both language groups (n English = 2,844 and n Spanish = 205). Subsequently, we applied the PSS scale in a theoretical application by examining its association with key steps in the PrEP uptake cascade (i.e., perceived PrEP candidacy, PrEP willingness, PrEP intentions, and having spoken to provider about PrEP) stratified by language. Results of the IRT analyses provided evidence that the translated version of the PSS was appropriate for use among this sample. Further, among English respondents, PrEP stigma was negatively associated with perceived PrEP candidacy (B = −0.30, p ≤ .001), PrEP willingness (B = −0.46, p ≤ .001), and PrEP intentions (B = −0.23, p = .003). PrEP stigma, among Spanish respondents, was not significantly associated with any of the PrEP cascade steps. This study demonstrated that the PSS scale performs adequately for both English-and Spanish-speaking Latino SMM. However, researchers and health professionals alike should pay close attention to the nuanced effects in U.S.-based English-and Spanishlanguage samples as PrEP stigma may impact the PrEP cascade for one language sample and not the other.