2017
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1310658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a smartwatch as a prompting device for people with acquired brain injury: a single case experimental design study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent meta-analysis of prospective memory studies in middle-aged and older adults revealed overall positive outcomes for external memory aids in enhancing prospective memory (Jones et al 2021). Commonly used external memory aids include smartphones, smartwatches, and Google Calendar, which have proven useful for improving prospective memory performance in individuals with brain injuries and disease who are especially prone to absent-minded forgetting (eg, El Haj et al 2020; Jamieson et al 2019;Svoboda et al 2012).…”
Section: Prospective Memory and Cognitive Offloadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of prospective memory studies in middle-aged and older adults revealed overall positive outcomes for external memory aids in enhancing prospective memory (Jones et al 2021). Commonly used external memory aids include smartphones, smartwatches, and Google Calendar, which have proven useful for improving prospective memory performance in individuals with brain injuries and disease who are especially prone to absent-minded forgetting (eg, El Haj et al 2020; Jamieson et al 2019;Svoboda et al 2012).…”
Section: Prospective Memory and Cognitive Offloadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar success has been demonstrated in personal digital assistants (PDAs) (e.g. Gillette and DePompei, 2008;Wright et al, 2001); smart watches (Jamieson et al 2017b); and smart phones (Savage and Svoboda, 2013;Svoboda and Richards, 2009). In their systematic review, Jamieson et al (2014) found good evidence for the efficacy of prospective memory reminding systems; a meta-analysis of seven group studies, of participants with ABI, gave a large overall effect size (d = 1.27) (n = 147).…”
Section: Assistive Technologymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This is because, unlike during intensive rehabilitation, there is not a large staff to look out for the service user through the day and prompt them when necessary. Community care teams for brain injury often prioritise memory functioning and prompting technology can have a key role to play in helping to compensate for memory impairments [18,28]. In the present paper, we investigate the impact of unsolicited prompts for helping people with memory impairments after a brain injury living in the community undergoing ongoing support or care.…”
Section: Specific Features For Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to this is the perceived need for reminders. A recent study investigating the use of smartwatch prompts in a community ABI setting highlighted the importance of motivation that influences technology use [19]. Central to this motivation is the perceived need for the technology.…”
Section: Insight and Perceived Needmentioning
confidence: 99%