1981
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4608/11/4/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a pair potential for the study of defects and disorder in aluminium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies on this system have been performed by CMD simulations combined with a variety of interatomic pair potentials. [3][4][5] The results obtained showed fair agreement with the experimental data, with some discrepancies appearing for either the static structure factor 3,4 or the dynamic structure factor. 5 A recent AIMD simulation 6 focusing on the liquid static structural properties only, obtained results in good agreement with experiment.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies on this system have been performed by CMD simulations combined with a variety of interatomic pair potentials. [3][4][5] The results obtained showed fair agreement with the experimental data, with some discrepancies appearing for either the static structure factor 3,4 or the dynamic structure factor. 5 A recent AIMD simulation 6 focusing on the liquid static structural properties only, obtained results in good agreement with experiment.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…1,9 Although the von Weizsäcker term, T W ͓ (r)͔ϭ 1 8 ͐drٌ͉ (r)͉ 2 / (r), is thought to be essential for a good description of the kinetic energy in the limit of rapidly varying density, 10 other terms are usually incorporated so as to reproduce correctly some exactly known limits. In the uniform density limit, the kinetic energy is given by the Thomas-Fermi functional, T TF ͓ (r)͔ϭ 3 10 ͐dr (r) ϫk F (r) 2 , where k F (r)ϭ(3 2 ) 1/3 (r) 1/3 is the local Fermi wave vector; and for an almost uniform density, linear response theory ͑LRT͒ becomes correct, with a response function given by the Lindhard function.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of the discrepancy between the vacancy formation energy predicted by the BOP and those predicted by first-principles calculations is not clear. It is likely that the BOP is unable to account for local changes in electronic structure around the vacancy that are properly captured in DFT calculations [99].…”
Section: Fcc Iridiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is more likely that the BOP is unable to account for local changes in electronic structure around the vacancy that are properly captured in DFT calculations. 64 The inclusion of analytic screening functions for the bond integrals may improve the predictions for the vacancy formation energy in iridium, 24 assuming that the observed discrepancies are electronic in origin.…”
Section: Vacancy Formation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%