2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a morphological acceleration factor in the simulation of large-scale fluvial morphodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As widely adopted in long‐term simulations (Coco et al., 2013; Roelvink, 2006), a morphological factor is used to speed up the morphodynamic evolution. In particular, following previous works on the morphodynamics of fluvial and estuarine environments (e.g., George et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2020), the morphological factor is varied during a simulation, adapting its value to the overall rate of bed variation. After each simulated tidal cycle, the elevation of each computational grid point is first updated through Equation and then multiplied by the morphological factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As widely adopted in long‐term simulations (Coco et al., 2013; Roelvink, 2006), a morphological factor is used to speed up the morphodynamic evolution. In particular, following previous works on the morphodynamics of fluvial and estuarine environments (e.g., George et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2020), the morphological factor is varied during a simulation, adapting its value to the overall rate of bed variation. After each simulated tidal cycle, the elevation of each computational grid point is first updated through Equation and then multiplied by the morphological factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations of long-term morphological change can be computationally demanding if done by brute force (e.g., Safak et al 2017), so methods have been developed to speed up morphodynamical models (Lesser et al 2004, Roelvink 2006, Ranasinghe et al 2011, Roelvink & Reniers 2012, Luijendijk et al 2019, Morgan et al 2020) using a combination of two approaches: input reduction (or input schematization; e.g., Walstra et al 2013, Luijendijk et al 2019) and morphological acceleration (Lesser et al 2004, Roelvink 2006, Ranasinghe et al 2011. Input reduction seeks to force the model using representative conditions (e.g., the average wave height) or only the conditions that effect morphodynamic change (e.g., waves greater than some threshold).…”
Section: Morphological Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it may be possible to define rigorous links between numerical and small‐scale physical depositional systems (e.g. flume experiments), when modelling stratigraphic‐scale variations it is generally computationally desirable to further shorten morphological evolution timescales of predicted depositional bodies by applying a morphological acceleration factor (Lesser, 2009; Morgan et al, 2020; Roelvink, 2006). In such models it is common to infer links between numerical and physical systems by general references to the balance between competing sediment‐transport processes and relative formation times of different scale depositional bodies (e.g.…”
Section: Wave‐dominated Delta Depositional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%