2022
DOI: 10.17816/vto99974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a modified hinge-distraction apparatus for chronic injuries of the ankle and foot

Abstract: The experience (126 patients) in the use of the suggested by O.V. Oganesyan modified hingedistraction device for the treatment of old foot dislocations and fractures of the ankle joint articular ends is presented. Perfection of the construction enabled to simplify the application of the device as well as makes it possible to put together the articular ends and their fragments either in one step or gradually, to maintain the width of the articular slit along the articular surface, to perform active and passive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of managing patients with the consequences of intra-articular injuries of distal tibia and/or fibula remains relevant due to their high prevalence and incidence, frequent poor outcomes and disability [1,2]. This is also caused by the variety of surgical techniques including those joint-preserving (corrective osteotomy of the distal fibula and tibia followed by osteosynthesis, arthroscopic interventions, or distraction arthroplasty) and not jointpreserving (arthrodesis or total arthroplasty) [3,4]. Restrictions on the foot functioning in the late postoperative period depend, among other things, on the type of surgical intervention performed on the patient [5].…”
Section: Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of managing patients with the consequences of intra-articular injuries of distal tibia and/or fibula remains relevant due to their high prevalence and incidence, frequent poor outcomes and disability [1,2]. This is also caused by the variety of surgical techniques including those joint-preserving (corrective osteotomy of the distal fibula and tibia followed by osteosynthesis, arthroscopic interventions, or distraction arthroplasty) and not jointpreserving (arthrodesis or total arthroplasty) [3,4]. Restrictions on the foot functioning in the late postoperative period depend, among other things, on the type of surgical intervention performed on the patient [5].…”
Section: Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%