2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of a Mobile Laboratory Unit in Support of Patient Management and Epidemiological Surveillance during the 2005 Marburg Outbreak in Angola

Abstract: BackgroundMarburg virus (MARV), a zoonotic pathogen causing severe hemorrhagic fever in man, has emerged in Angola resulting in the largest outbreak of Marburg hemorrhagic fever (MHF) with the highest case fatality rate to date.Methodology/Principal FindingsA mobile laboratory unit (MLU) was deployed as part of the World Health Organization outbreak response. Utilizing quantitative real-time PCR assays, this laboratory provided specific MARV diagnostics in Uige, the epicentre of the outbreak. The MLU operated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(49 reference statements)
2
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the data set from paired blood and oral swab specimens (Figure 1A) demonstrate consistently higher Ct values for the Ebola target genes (by up to 14 Cts) in swabs compared to blood specimens, indicating that swabs are considerably less sensitive. This is consistent with findings from previous filovirus outbreaks in Republic of Congo and Angola and several animal studies [58], which indicated that swabs are suitable specimens only for severely ill patients and corpses. Especially for deceased patients, the anticipated high virus load [58] and safety concerns with performing cardiac puncture in field settings also support the continued use of swabs; however using swabs for the diagnosis of live patients will lead to false negative results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the data set from paired blood and oral swab specimens (Figure 1A) demonstrate consistently higher Ct values for the Ebola target genes (by up to 14 Cts) in swabs compared to blood specimens, indicating that swabs are considerably less sensitive. This is consistent with findings from previous filovirus outbreaks in Republic of Congo and Angola and several animal studies [58], which indicated that swabs are suitable specimens only for severely ill patients and corpses. Especially for deceased patients, the anticipated high virus load [58] and safety concerns with performing cardiac puncture in field settings also support the continued use of swabs; however using swabs for the diagnosis of live patients will lead to false negative results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…WHO-recommended clinical case diagnoses for Ebola and Marburg VHFs require epidemiological connection to a confirmed case [44,45]. When laboratory testing is not performed, there are inevitably extended delays to initial outbreak identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coverall suits, goggles and FFP-3 face masks within a designated 'hot zone' [6]. However, this option has a number of disadvantages: (i) the time laboratory personnel can work in full protective gear is very limited especially in tropical climate, (ii) a designated separate 'hot zone' is needed, adding another factor to the already complex task of setting up a field laboratory, and (iii) this 'hot zone' has to be considered as contaminated until it has been completely disinfected.…”
Section: Biosafety and Biosecurity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…malaria, dengue, leptospirosis and typhus [4]. Therefore, accurate identification of the causative agents is critical for effective containment of the outbreaks and provision of appropriate supportive care to the patients [5][6][7][8][9]. In preparedness for rapid, global response to naturally occurring and emerging infectious disease outbreaks, the International Cooperation and Development Office of the European Commission (DG DevCo) launched the European Mobile field laboratory (EMLab, www.emlab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%