2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a hydrogel implant in the repair of osteochondral defects of the knee: A biomechanical evaluation of restoration of native contact pressures in cadaver knees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Finally, all implants were placed 0.2 mm proud, which improves the loadbearing capabilities of the implants 19,25 and avoids potential damage to opposing tissue in versions that have been kept as much as 1 mm proud. 53 Of all implants tested, 20% PVA 1 pTi resulted in no significant difference in the sum of forces in the defect ROI when compared with the intact condition; a significant decrease in the sum of forces in the M-C ROI versus defect at 14% of the gait cycle; and a significant increase in the sum of forces in the C-C ROI versus defect at 45% of the gait cycle. In addition, the WCoCS in the anterior-posterior direction was not significantly different from the intact condition for the 20% PVA 1 pTi device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…50 Finally, all implants were placed 0.2 mm proud, which improves the loadbearing capabilities of the implants 19,25 and avoids potential damage to opposing tissue in versions that have been kept as much as 1 mm proud. 53 Of all implants tested, 20% PVA 1 pTi resulted in no significant difference in the sum of forces in the defect ROI when compared with the intact condition; a significant decrease in the sum of forces in the M-C ROI versus defect at 14% of the gait cycle; and a significant increase in the sum of forces in the C-C ROI versus defect at 45% of the gait cycle. In addition, the WCoCS in the anterior-posterior direction was not significantly different from the intact condition for the 20% PVA 1 pTi device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The ability of implants to mechanically function within the knee joint should ideally form part of the preclinical evaluation process, 38 but because of the complexity of creating cadaveric models that can mimic physiological loads, such evaluations are rare. Sismondo et al 53 used a cadaveric model that applied one-third of physiological forces to quantify the ability of a PVA hydrogel implant to restore the stress distribution with a focal articular cartilage defect. Other studies have included an assessment of scaffold fixation during simulated continuous passive motion 20 and analyses of the effect of osteochondral graft height on contact mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, polymer networks are infused by small molecules to form liquid gels, such as hydrogels or organogels. The infusion of a fluid phase into the polymer networks will significantly enhance the chain relaxation and reduce the internal frictions, leading to inferior damping property 29 31 . Even although these gels can improve the damping performance by using phase transition behavior, this behavior only occurs at certain temperature conditions and makes them mechanically unstable 25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are zwitterionic polymers like polysulfobetaine (PMEDSAH), [ 28,87 ] or common ionic compounds that contain aluminum ions [ 88 ] or iron ions. [ 89,90 ] PVA hydrogels are toughened by adding compounds with the above‐mentioned ions.…”
Section: Strengthening Mechanisms and Basic Property Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%