2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for solving a multi-objective single-machine scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fuzzy numberã is a convex normalized fuzzy set of the real line R whose membership function is piecewise continuous [29][30][31][32]. Eq.…”
Section: Fuzzy Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuzzy numberã is a convex normalized fuzzy set of the real line R whose membership function is piecewise continuous [29][30][31][32]. Eq.…”
Section: Fuzzy Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their computational results showed that the performance of their heuristic algorithms proposed by Voutsinas and Pappis [16] decreases when the problem size increases. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam et al [18] presented a fuzzy multi-objective linear programming (FMOLP) model for solving a multiobjective single-machine scheduling problem that minimize the total weighted tardiness and makespan simultaneously. TavakkoliMoghaddam et al [19] proposed branch-and-bound (B&B) method to find the optimal sequence of a set of jobs for a single-machine scheduling problem with idle insert, in which the objective function is to minimize the sum of maximum earliness and tardiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is NP-hard in the strong sense, since the task of minimizing TWT on a single machine (1jj P w j T j ) is already NP-hard in the strong sense [22]. Only a few articles have considered single machine bicriteria scheduling problems with release dates [20,[32][33][34][35]44]. Most of them developed heuristics to tackle the studied problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%