1986
DOI: 10.1117/12.966706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use Of A Computerized Brain Atlas In Positron Emission Tomography

Abstract: A computerized brain atlas data base has been developed, primarily for use in positron emission tomography.The underlying information was derived from a digitized cryosectioned cadaver brain.The atlas can be individually adjusted to fit a wide range of patients with reasonable accuracy.The necessary transformations are chosen so that the atlas will fit an initial set of CT or NMR images of the patient.The individualized brain atlas opens several new possibilities in the quantification and evaluation of PET dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A parameter measuring this effect in a specific region is the recovery coefficient. The recovery coefficient for the putamen is 0.85 in PC 384-7B (Bohm et al, 1986) and close to 1.0 in PC 2048-15B. This difference in recovery coefficients is reflected in the about 10 per cent higher P/C ratios obtained with PC 2048-15B compared to PC 384-7B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A parameter measuring this effect in a specific region is the recovery coefficient. The recovery coefficient for the putamen is 0.85 in PC 384-7B (Bohm et al, 1986) and close to 1.0 in PC 2048-15B. This difference in recovery coefficients is reflected in the about 10 per cent higher P/C ratios obtained with PC 2048-15B compared to PC 384-7B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The images are reconstructed on a 128 x 128 matrix with a pixel size of 2.55 mm. The recovery coefficient for the human putamen has been estimated to 0.85 (Bohm et al, 1986).…”
Section: Pet Camera Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the brains of normal subjects are anatomically different, it is a prerequisite that individual rCBF images be anatomically standardized before the mean changes in rCBF of a whole experimental group of subjects can be calculated. This anatomical standardization can be performed either with landmark-based stereotactical procedures or by computerized brain atlases [Bohm et al, 1986;Evans et al, 1988;Fox et al, 1988;Friston et al, 1990;Seitz et al, 19901. It has not been examined to what extent the anatomical standardization procedures themselves change the original data, nor has it been examined how the rCBF-subtraction values are distributed in each pixel across subjects in spatially standardized pictures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], the shape of the cortex in slices of a human brain was digitized and stored as a brain atlas. Using various geometrical warping transforms, the shape could be adapted to different brain-sizes with reasonable accuracy.…”
Section: B Source Model and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%