“…In total, 21 studies were included in the systematic review in which 11 different RATs for prolonged QT were used [ 12 , 14 , 19 – 24 , 31 – 33 , 36 , 40 , 43 , 44 ]. Most commonly used tools were risk scores ( n = 9) [ 12 , 14 , 21 – 27 ], computerized physician order entry systems ( n = 3) [ 31 – 33 ], and clinical decision support systems ( n = 6) [ 19 , 20 , 36 – 39 ]. Of the studies, eight were conducted in the USA [ 12 , 21 , 22 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 38 , 44 ], four in Belgium [ 14 , 23 , 24 , 27 ], two in Australia [ 25 , 40 , 43 ], one in Germany [ 20 ], four in the Netherlands [ 26 , 31 , 37 , 39 ], and one in Sweden [ 19 ].…”