2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use and reporting of multiple imputation in medical research – a review

Abstract: Background. Multiple imputation (MI) is an advanced, principled method of dealing with missing data in statistical analyses, a common problem in medical research. This paper sought to document the use of MI in general medical journals and to evaluate the information provided to readers about the application of the procedure in studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
144
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
144
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…HRs are adjusted for all explanatory variables included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. We assume missing values-BMI (21%, 197 of 927 patients) and hemoglobin (6%, 59 of 927 patients)-to be random and used multiple imputation to replace missing values 40 times based on the remaining explanatory variables [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRs are adjusted for all explanatory variables included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. We assume missing values-BMI (21%, 197 of 927 patients) and hemoglobin (6%, 59 of 927 patients)-to be random and used multiple imputation to replace missing values 40 times based on the remaining explanatory variables [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing data rarely occur completely at random and, therefore, imputation using multiple regression techniques was applied as recommended by many methodologists [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Missing data were estimated by the multiple imputation technique. 20 Two-tailed values of p<0.05 were considered significant. Data were tabulated in MS Excel 2003® and analyzed using SPSS 17.0 ® software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%