2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use and Performance of MQTT and CoAP as Internet of Things Application Protocol using NodeMCU ESP8266

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown there is a minor difference in speeds when juxtaposing these two protocols alongside each other. According to [ 43 ] the CoAP protocol is based on User Datagram Protocol (UDP), which does not care for ordering of arriving data and puts less stress on reliability of the messages to arrive. Its lack of Acknowledgements (ACK) of transferred data makes data arrive faster on the opposing end-point (Granted the packet reaches its destination).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown there is a minor difference in speeds when juxtaposing these two protocols alongside each other. According to [ 43 ] the CoAP protocol is based on User Datagram Protocol (UDP), which does not care for ordering of arriving data and puts less stress on reliability of the messages to arrive. Its lack of Acknowledgements (ACK) of transferred data makes data arrive faster on the opposing end-point (Granted the packet reaches its destination).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown there is a minor difference in speeds when juxtaposing these two protocols alongside each other. According to [43] the CoAP protocol is based on User Datagram Protocol (UDP), which does As shown, in the table, the duration recordings on ten execution cycles have similar values to each other. There are a few cases where the execution of the program takes anywhere from 0.5 to 1 s more than the values here, and this could be attributed to the volatile nature of the go routines that are not entirely running in parallel.…”
Section: Performance Testingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leading control component of the unit is the STM32F4 microcontroller (China) on the STM32F4Discovery debug board (China) [19][20][21]. The microcontroller communicates with the WiFi module ESP8266 (China) [22][23][24][25] and the GSM module SIM800L (China) [26,27] using AT commands. The use of two data transmission modules is due to the situation of the absence of a WiFi network, which is possible in the field.…”
Section: Application Of the Methods Of Decomposition And Identification Of Classes In The Formation Of The Structure Of The Information Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown there is a minor difference in speeds when juxtaposing these two protocols alongside each other. According to [31] the CoAP protocol is based on User Datagram Protocol (UDP), which does not care for ordering of arriving data and puts less stress on reliability of the messages to arrive. Its lack of Acknowledgements (ACK) of transferred data makes data arrive faster on the opposing end-point.…”
Section: Performance Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%