2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The usability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for measuring park-based physical activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While behavior mapping proved to be an effective way to record the location of individuals, their characteristics, and their physical activity, it is time consuming and may not be suitable for monitoring park use in a large area, especially when the data are initially hand-recorded on the sites. Future studies could combine this method with other techniques such as video-taping and unmanned aerial vehicles, to make the process of data collection more precise and efficient [64].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While behavior mapping proved to be an effective way to record the location of individuals, their characteristics, and their physical activity, it is time consuming and may not be suitable for monitoring park use in a large area, especially when the data are initially hand-recorded on the sites. Future studies could combine this method with other techniques such as video-taping and unmanned aerial vehicles, to make the process of data collection more precise and efficient [64].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each observation in a park took about 10 to 15 minutes, enabling five to six parks per two-hour observation period. Park and Ewing (2017) show that the UAV observation could save time by about 21% after accounting for the time spent on video counts. If this study employed the on-theground observation tool such as SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities), it would have needed to divide each park into smaller target areas where an observer can scan without encountering visual obstructions, which would require much more time.…”
Section: Figure 3 Uav Observation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fill in the gap of existing tools, this study tests a new method of pedestrian observation: the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones. UAVs carrying a video camera combine the advantages of human observation and video recording (Park & Ewing 2017). As UAVs cover a greater area in a shorter amount of time than other methods, they are expected to save time and money required for data collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%