The Usability and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technology–Based Lifestyle and Medical Intervention Apps Supporting Health Care During Pregnancy: Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundA growing number of mobile health (mHealth) technology–based apps are being developed for personal lifestyle and medical health care support, of which several apps are related to pregnancy. Evidence on usability and effectiveness is limited but crucial for successful implementation.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the usability, that is, feasibility and acceptability, as well as effectiveness of mHealth lifestyle and medical apps to support health care during pregnancy in high-income countries. Feasibility was defined as the actual use, interest, intention, and continued use; perceived suitability; and ability of users to carry out the activities of the app. Acceptability was assessed by user satisfaction, appreciation, and the recommendation of the app to others.MethodsWe performed a systematic review searching the following electronic databases for studies on mHealth technology–based apps in maternal health care in developed countries: EMBASE, MEDLINE Epub (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. All included studies were scored on quality, using the ErasmusAGE Quality Score or the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Main outcome measures were usability and effectiveness of mHealth lifestyle and medical health care support apps related to pregnancy. All studies were screened by 2 reviewers individually, and the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were followed.ResultsOur search identified 4204 titles and abstracts, of which 2487 original studies remained after removing duplicates. We performed full-text screening of 217 studies, of which 29 were included in our study. In total, 19 out of 29 studies reported on mHealth apps to adopt healthy lifestyles and 10 out of 29 studies to support medical care. The lifestyle apps evaluated in 19 studies reported on usability and effectiveness: 10 studies reported positive on acceptability, and 14 studies reported on feasibility with positive results except one study. In total, 4 out of 19 studies evaluating effectiveness showed significant results on weight gain restriction during pregnancy, intake of vegetables and fruits, and smoking cessation. The 10 studies on medical mHealth apps involved asthma care, diabetic treatment, and encouraging vaccination. Only one study on diabetic treatment reported on acceptability with a positive user satisfaction. In total, 9 out of 10 studies reported on effectiveness. Moreover, the power of most studies was inadequate to show significant effects.ConclusionsMost studies on mHealth apps to support lifestyle and medical care for high-income countries reveal the usability of these apps to reduce gestational weight gain, increase intakes of vegetables and fruit, to quit smoking cessation, and to support health care for prevention of asthma and infections during pregnancy. In general, the evidence on effectiveness of these apps is limited and needs further investigation before implementation in medical health care.

The effect of digital physical activity interventions on daily step count: a randomised controlled crossover substudy of the MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study

“…The HealthKit step count field was capped at 20 000 steps per day and the distance field was capped at 25 000 m per day. Data from smartphones and smartwatches were analysed separately (appendix pp 2,9). Data from other devices that provide data to HealthKit were not used in the primary analysis, but were incorporated to measure duration and quality of sleep (secondary study outcomes).…”

“…25 We also used a false discovery ratecorrected p value threshold of 0·05 to determine whether differences between two interventions were significant. Analysis of exploratory outcomes and posthoc analyses were done using the same linear modelling framework to assess data obtained from smartwatches (appendix pp 2, 6,9) and to analyse data from users who completed all four interventions.…”

“…Smartphones and smartwatches, such as the iPhone (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA), offer a potential platform to achieve this goal. 9,10 To date, most studies of mobile health monitoring have used wearables and smartphones to track physical activity and provide feedback to the user or clinician. 11 No entirely digital randomised studies (ie, without some level of persontoperson contact) have assessed the effect of wearable and smartphonebased intervention on physical activity.…”

Effects of continuous care for patients with type 2 diabetes using mobile health application: A randomised controlled trial

“…6 For patients with diabetes, blood glucose control requires the combination of drug treatments and lifestyle interventions, which are dependent on self-management and attitude; however, levels of self-management are generally low and lead to poor blood glucose control, which greatly increases complication risks and subsequently leads to a significant decline in quality of life. 7 In particular, patients with type 2 diabetes lack sustainable and effective management after hospital discharge and therefore require continuous care. 4 Essential to the provision of continuous care is the establishment of an effective platform of communication between health care providers and patients.…”

Smartphone applications available to pregnant women in the United Kingdom: An assessment of nutritional information

“…Smartphone apps targeted to pregnant women provide an opportunity to promote health behaviours and complement maternity services (Overdijkink et al, 2018). The health care sector must be confident in the alignment of information with evidence-based recommendations.…”