2017
DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1286884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The US National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education Measurement and Assessment Collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interdisciplinary research approach has contributed to some interesting observations with possible implications for future implementations of the learning activity and for the enhancement of identities through the analysis of two different professions, such as the role of teamwork, which has been considered a "priority" (Brandt & Schmitz, 2017). The focus on teamwork is coherent with research by Payne (2006) in the context of multi-professional teams, as performance as part of a team is often cited by HSC students whereas student teachers see this only as a learning methodology and not central to their future careers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdisciplinary research approach has contributed to some interesting observations with possible implications for future implementations of the learning activity and for the enhancement of identities through the analysis of two different professions, such as the role of teamwork, which has been considered a "priority" (Brandt & Schmitz, 2017). The focus on teamwork is coherent with research by Payne (2006) in the context of multi-professional teams, as performance as part of a team is often cited by HSC students whereas student teachers see this only as a learning methodology and not central to their future careers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quick scan of most health professions schools today reveals a collection of siloed health professions educational structures and processes working in parallel to each other to transform independently and to a number of affiliated practice organizations with little dialogue, integration, or collaboration between them (Earnest & Brandt, 2014). While most IPE scholarship measures student learning and teamwork at the Kirkpatrick lower levels of outcomes (e.g., reaction, attitudes, knowledge and skills) (Brandt & Schmitz, 2017;Walsh et al, 2014), less evidence indicates a positive impact on performance in practice as well as clinical outcomes (Institute of Medicine, 2015). Much work remains to design and evaluate IPE curricula based upon levels of learning and impact on health and systems.…”
Section: A Call To Action For Health Professions Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a groundswell of evidence to support teams in healthcare, there remain significant challenges with accurately capturing team composition and team member contributions as they manifest in daily practice (Brandt et al, 2014; Brandt & Schmitz, 2017; Reeves et al, 2015). Traditional methods of studying teams often lack connection to the real‐world clinical setting and as noted earlier, miss integral members of the team.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods of studying teams often lack connection to the real‐world clinical setting and as noted earlier, miss integral members of the team. Few studies of clinical teams are grounded in theory and utilize common team definitions to measure core concepts of high‐performance teamwork (Brandt & Schmitz, 2017; Fiscella et al, 2017; Schmitt et al, 1982). Team composition, the members who comprise healthcare teams, is rarely specified or measured, a problem that is compounded by the current reliance on billing records that are limited to team members who deliver reimbursable services (Dai et al, 2020; Edmondson & Harvey, 2018; Gittell et al, 2008; Holden et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%