2006
DOI: 10.1159/000090221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uremic Environment and Muscle Dysfunction in Man and Rat

Abstract: Background: Patients reaching end-stage renal disease experience debilitating fatigue, with progression of this disease, rendering patients dysfunctional in their everyday lives. Methods: In vivomeasurements of muscle function, assessed using surface electromyography (EMG), were made on 25 patients prior to and after a session of hemodialysis (HD) treatment, alongsidein vitro measurements of muscle function in isolated rat muscles incubated in normal or uremic conditions approximating to those found in uremic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in results may be related to the differences in the electrophysiological techniques used by these studies: Johansen et al 38 used CMAP, whereas Fahal et al 37 used EMG (interferential pattern). The third study, 59 a case series, reported the presence of myopathic changes. The functional measures of strength reported in this study implicitly suggested muscle weakness, since the performance of the ESRD/HD group (age 54.5 e 2.6 years) on the 30-second chair-stand test (12 e 0.8 reps) was comparable to that of women between 75 and 79 years of age.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation in results may be related to the differences in the electrophysiological techniques used by these studies: Johansen et al 38 used CMAP, whereas Fahal et al 37 used EMG (interferential pattern). The third study, 59 a case series, reported the presence of myopathic changes. The functional measures of strength reported in this study implicitly suggested muscle weakness, since the performance of the ESRD/HD group (age 54.5 e 2.6 years) on the 30-second chair-stand test (12 e 0.8 reps) was comparable to that of women between 75 and 79 years of age.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38,59 Two of these studies 37,38 found statistically significant reductions in muscle strength in participants with ESRD/HD. However, Johansen et al 38 suggested neural mechanisms contributing to muscle weakness, while Fahal et al 37 identified causes intrinsic to the muscle.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sEMG frequency recorded prior to dialysis was generally found to be abnormal, when compared with a normal range of 2 nd dorsal interosseous muscles of the hand and on the thigh m. Vastus lateralis. This study also revealed a clear benefit of haemodialysis in terms of sEMG frequency of the 2 nd dorsal interosseous muscle (Harrison et al, 2006). Moreover, these authors found that the in vivo analysis of sEMG changes with a session of haemodialysis seemed to be limited to relatively fast-twitch muscles, a finding that was supported by a study of isolated rat extensor digitorum longus muscle, in which changes in the uremic environment were shown to exert a rapid loss of contractile force (Harrison et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It was noted that 50% of patients requiring dialysis had stopped their professional activity as a result of chronic renal failure, attributed to coronary (15% of patients), cardiovascular (23%), and bone or muscle (24%) related conditions (Evans et al, 1985). In a recent study involving patients on haemodialysis, in vivo measurements of muscle function were made using sEMG (Harrison et al, 2006). The sEMG frequency recorded prior to dialysis was generally found to be abnormal, when compared with a normal range of 2 nd dorsal interosseous muscles of the hand and on the thigh m. Vastus lateralis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation