2015
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1042143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The urban–rural divide, regional disaggregation and the convergence of crime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In my baseline specification, I include state and year fixed effects, denoted by α s and δ t , respectively, in order to capture time‐invariant, state‐specific unobservable characteristics and national time trends. I also include region‐by‐year effects, θ rt, to capture annual, region‐specific shocks that may affect criminal behavior (e.g., weather or pollution shocks) as well as to control for the convergence in crime rates across the United States (Cook & Winfield, 2013, 2015). In addition to the fixed effects, I include vectors of state‐specific demographic and economic covariates indicated by X st .…”
Section: Emperical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In my baseline specification, I include state and year fixed effects, denoted by α s and δ t , respectively, in order to capture time‐invariant, state‐specific unobservable characteristics and national time trends. I also include region‐by‐year effects, θ rt, to capture annual, region‐specific shocks that may affect criminal behavior (e.g., weather or pollution shocks) as well as to control for the convergence in crime rates across the United States (Cook & Winfield, 2013, 2015). In addition to the fixed effects, I include vectors of state‐specific demographic and economic covariates indicated by X st .…”
Section: Emperical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review shows that previous studies support the population convergence of violent and property crime rates in the USA using beta and sigma convergence tests Watson, 2013, Cook andWinfield, 2015;Baharom et al, 2008). This empirical evidence is consistent with the population convergence of the violent crime rate, while it contradicts the population divergence of the property crime rate observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Cook and Winfield (2013) use the classical convergence approach to analyse crime at the state level in the USA over the period from 1960 to 2009. Moreover the same authors in 2015 extended their study considering counties and states (Cook & Winfield (2015)). In addition, Valdivia and Castro (2013) using a spatial panel regression, tested beta convergence of homicide rates across Mexican municipalities and presented different patterns of convergence depending on the gender of the victims.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is in line with the literature in terms of the effects of spatial scale on crime rates. For example, Cook and Winfield (2015) report strong signs of beta convergence for both states and counties in the US. However, from 2000 to 2010 (the latest available data in their study), they reported sigma convergence for states while divergence for counties.…”
Section: Sigma and Beta Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%